https://www.thefreedictionary.com/globalism >>1. A national geopolitical policy in which the entire world is regarded as the appropriate sphere for a state's influence. >>2. The development of social, cultural, technological, or economic networks that transcend national boundaries; globalization. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Globalism >>A **nomadic** political ideology used by elites to perpetrate a new world order >>Globalism typically aligns with progressivism despite the fact followers of this ideology share little views with progressives. It can already be seen throughout all major social media and news agencies. >>Aims to "lift people out of poverty" at the expense of 1st world countries. However, all that happens is the plundering of 1st world countries while people continue to die around the world. Where the money goes from globalist operations is truly unknown. >>What is certain is that Globalism increases awareness of events in faraway parts of the world. Albeit to create disinformation campaigns and manage the general populace of 3rd world countries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalism >>Globalism refers to various systems with scope beyond the merely international. It is used by political scientists, such as Joseph Nye, to describe "attempts to understand all the interconnections of the modern world—and to highlight patterns that underlie (and explain) them."[1] While primarily associated with world-systems, it can be used to describe other global trends. **The term is also frequently used as an pejorative by far-right movements and conspiracy theorists. Usage in this way has also been associated with anti-Semitism, as anti-semites frequently appropriate the word globalist for jews.[2][3][4]** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9-T9c44zxs https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Globalisation >>Official narrative >>Wikipedia reports that "globalisation is the process of international integration arising from the interchange of world views, products, ideas, and other aspects of culture", and suggests that is was popularised in the late 1980s and the 1990s. In 2000, the International Monetary Fund identified four basic aspects of globalization: trade and transactions, capital and investment movements, migration and movement of people, and the dissemination of knowledge. >>Problems >>Like "terrorism", the word "globalisation" has a rather imprecise meaning, though it is often used to refer to "economic globalisation", a rather establishment-friendly usage; while advances in travel and telecommunication technology have lead quite naturally, perhaps even inevitably, to a greater intermixing of languages, cultures etc. the corporate agenda referred to as "(economic) globalisation" seems far less natural and is certainly not inevitable. The commercially-controlled media has applied the label "anti-globalisation" as a catch all to any groups which promote alternative models of globalisation. [1] >>Economic globalisation >>The banner of "economic globalisation" is often used as a means of changing national laws, a so-called process of "harmonization". In practice, one aspect of a group's laws are often harmonized by choosing the most business friendly of the set of laws available, and standardising on that. Where states have a wide variety of laws and regulations, a set of such harmonizations can result in a large shift in effective laws. >>Supranational institutions >>Especially since NAFTA in 1994, so-called "free trade" agreements (for which citizens' approval is rarely sought), nation states have been signing away their sovereignty through the creation of supranational institutions and laws, apparently to resolve economic disputes. In practice these laws are often selectively enforced, ie. the USA broke its trade agreements with Mexico by imposing import taxes on wheat and could get away with it because Mexico had no power to enforce its part of the contract. >>The sweeping powers, undemocratic and unaccountable nature of such authorities have evoked widespread concern with some critics suggesting that they are part of a globalist agenda to render the nation state obsolete by establishing a New World Order. These concerns have not been widely reported by the commercially-controlled media. https://conservapedia.com/Globalism >>Globalism is the failed liberal authoritarian desire for a "one world" view that rejects the important role of nations in protecting values, public health and safety or encouraging productivity. Globalism is anti-American in encouraging Americans to adopt a "world view" rather than an "American view." The ultimate goal of globalism is the eventual unification of humanity under a one-world government. Communists and Marxists are using globalization to advance their political aims.[1] >>Harms caused by globalism include the spread of deadly diseases, such as the coronavirus. Globalism also brings misguided support of unsuccessful political systems used by other countries to the United States. >>Globalists oppose nationalism, national sovereignty, and self-governance. Instead, they favor open borders, free trade,[2][3] H-1B visas, interventionism, foreign aid, and changing the U.S. Constitution. They oppose strong border security and the building of border walls. Globalists virulently opposed Donald Trump in 2016. Instead, globalists preferred Jeb Bush, John Kasich, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz for the nomination, the latter of which have voted in favor of the globalist agenda as senators. Globalists can come from several political leanings, from the far-left to those considered on the right-of-center.[4] George Soros and the Koch brothers are globalists. Globalists falsely claim that mass migration is necessary for economic growth.[5] While they often claim to support "liberal democracy," they usually align themselves with authoritarian communist regimes like China.[6] >>Liberals support globalism because it leads to centralized power, thereby providing liberals with an easier way to gain control. Liberals can more easily persuade a handful of people in a centralized government to rule in their favor than convince everyone of their agenda in a decentralized form of government. Goals of American globalists include: >>"harmonizing" our laws with foreign ones, rather than vice-versa >>amnesty for illegal aliens, open borders, no border wall >>more visas for guest workers >>repealing the Second Amendment >>eliminating the abortion issue from politics by making Roe v. Wade permanent >>repealing the Electoral College >>a parliamentary style of government >>repealing the Treaty Clause >>supporting many unnecessary treaties, like NAFTA and the Paris climate agreement, which don't receive Senate approval >>removing state sovereignty and, eventually, establishing a one-world government >>European globalists (also known as Europhiles) have similar goals, including the removal of national sovereignty and eventually establishing a politically unified Europe and world government,[7] encouraging mass migration[8] from countries that do not share the values of the European host countries, and the support of crony capitalism. Not only do they attempt to establish centralized control over Europe, but they also seek authority over the United States, as illustrated by an incident in 2018 where several European politicians claimed President Trump's tariffs were illegal and violated "international law."[9][10][11] >>Theologically conservative/orthodox Christians believe that the ultimate reason for the push for globalism and one-world government is rebellion against God leading up to the Antichrist – rather than submit to God and recognize that only He can unite the world and bring world peace, liberal globalists seek to create utopia themselves and glorify humanity rather than God.[12] Additionally, because Christianity is "exclusionary" – including, but not limited to, its claim that faith in Jesus is the only way to Heaven – it is antithetical to the universal values required to "govern the Earth."[13] Some globalists wish to effectively create a unified world religion.[14] >>According to the Oxford American Dictionary, globalism is the advocacy of "the interpretation or planning of economic and foreign policy in relation to events and developments throughout the world." In its most extreme forms, it is sometimes expressed using terms such as "one world," support for a single world government, and/or terms such as "world citizen" or "global citizen." Some globalist groups such as the World Federalist Movement, and some non-Christian religions such as Bahai, actively campaign for world government. "Global" is a currently fashionable term in business, where the term "international" would be more appropriate usage; the term "international" implies business operations between a few countries, while "global" implies worldwide business, making it an adequate term for some forms of business that do operate across the world. Many aspects of globalism fall under the umbrella of globalization, which refers to how local phenomena can become global phenomena. >>Globalism also involves the theory of a "global economy" in which the economic achievements of most if not all nations are interdependent with those of other nations around the world because of international trade. This is possible because of recent technological inventions such as the internet. For example, a farmer in Ghana can now be ensured that he is paid the standard market price for a particular crop because of the standards set in Chicago which he can check with a telephone or internet connection. >>Bhagwati (2004) explains how globalization has delivered a better standard of living in less developed countries, and how experiments with protectionist "import substitution" policies have systematically failed. he demonstrates that anti-globalism comprises a discontented brew of anti-capitalism, anti-corporatism, and anti-Americanism. His case that globalization has benefited the poor uses a two-step argument: trade enhances economic growth, and growth reduces poverty. He contrasts the failure of protectionism to deliver prosperity in post-colonial India and other countries with the progress and development in East Asia and other more outward-oriented countries. The growth spurred by globalization has not only expanded the pie but has done so in a way that is "socially benign" and possesses "a human face," says Bhagwati. Bhagwati refutes the liberal argument — heard frequently in the Democrat primary debates — that the U.S. must impose labor and environmental standards on poor countries in any future trade agreements. On the contrary, he shows that U.S. multinationals do not seek out less developed countries with low standards; instead they locate most of their affiliates in other high-wage, high-standard countries, and when they do invest in poor countries, they invariably pay wages and maintain standards far above those prevailing in the local economy. The result is not a "race to the bottom," but a race to the top. An inescapable implication is that if the Democrats succeed in withholding U.S. trade and investment from poor countries because they are poor, it will mean slower growth in those countries: fewer girls studying in school, and more working in farms, factories, and brothels.[17]