Ban On Encouraging Illegal Immigration Not Unconstitutional: Supreme Court | "To the extent that clause (iv) reaches any speech, it stretches no further than speech integral to unlawful conduct..."

512

•

Ban On Encouraging Illegal Immigration Not Unconstitutional: Supreme Court | "To the extent that clause (iv) reaches any speech, it stretches no further than speech integral to unlawful conduct..." (www.zerohedge.com)

A U.S. law that bars encouraging illegal immigration for advantage or gain is lawful, the Supreme Court ruled on June 23.

“After concluding that this statute criminalizes immigration advocacy and other protected speech, the Ninth Circuit held it unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment. That was error,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, wrote for the majority.

“Properly interpreted, this provision forbids only the intentional solicitation or facilitation of certain unlawful acts,” she added.

**A U.S. law that bars encouraging illegal immigration for advantage or gain is lawful, the Supreme Court ruled on June 23.** “After concluding that this statute criminalizes immigration advocacy and other protected speech, the Ninth Circuit held it unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment. That was error,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, wrote for the majority. “Properly interpreted, **this provision forbids only the intentional solicitation or facilitation of certain unlawful acts**,” she added.

(post is archived)

You can claim this sub in /s/subrequest