WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K
https://twitter.com/KeithWoodsYT/status/1651917024342294530

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Yeah , ive notice this huge push towards things that 'may incite violence or hatred'. even that goof reporter with musk said the same thing '.... an uptick in tweets that may incite violence or hatred'. It's a globohomo talking point - gone past the act of inciting violence/ hatred to the mere possibility that ''''someone''' else might be incited to violence / hatred.

Look out for religious Christian items/ National flags and anything to do with European culture.

[–] 0 pt

Look up the term Malinformation. Something that's true, but could incite (justified) violence or harm a person or group of people in other ways. Wonder how long it is before that gets slipped in somewhere, so that it makes objective facts against the law plain and clear.

[–] 0 pt

Just looked up malinformation - yea, the issue i have is rather than the spirit of the law being against clear/ obvious/ overt encouragement to incite/ hate it's now all about others being offended -like blm/ antifa/ npc's - and them doing violence or hate but blaming it on a third party that 'incited' them simply by existing.