![Anon explains Free Speech [1235x363 - 92KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/6swwaR.png){kind=link}
Anon is fully and completely wrong. obscenity is not now and never was protected by the first amendment (the only relevant metric for free speech) so his (((50 shades))) example is both terribly wrong and questionably subversive.
Anon is fully and completely wrong.
obscenity is not now and never was protected by the first amendment (the only relevant metric for free speech) so his (((50 shades))) example is both terribly wrong and questionably subversive.
(post is archived)