Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

415

"Calories Out" INCLUDES things like your age, race, metabolic conditions, disorders, genetic abnormalities and diseases etc. If you're a 90 year old niggress and you eat 2500 calories. You're going to gain weight. If you're a 17 year old White male and you eat 2500 calories. You're going to lose weight.

The thread about this yesterday was full of jew-lie after jew-lie after jew-lie.

Yes. Your metabolism (is only as fast as you make it, it's not set in stone) certainly changes the calories out half. But it's not a biological rule. It's a fundamental rule of reality.

"Calories Out" INCLUDES things like your age, race, metabolic conditions, disorders, genetic abnormalities and diseases etc. If you're a 90 year old niggress and you eat 2500 calories. You're going to gain weight. If you're a 17 year old White male and you eat 2500 calories. You're going to lose weight. The thread about this yesterday was full of jew-lie after jew-lie after jew-lie. Yes. Your metabolism (is only as fast as you make it, it's not set in stone) certainly changes the calories out half. But it's not a biological rule. It's a fundamental rule of reality.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 0 pt

That whole thread was confusing and dumb. I certainly get that the quality of food (presented as quality of calories??) heavily impacts your health in other ways because of a concept called nutrition. But for simple weight loss, calories in < calories out will always work.

[–] • 0 pt

I see, maybe it's just people misunderstanding each other on simple weight loss vs nutrition, and bad nutrition and its resulting diseases.