WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

"Calories Out" INCLUDES things like your age, race, metabolic conditions, disorders, genetic abnormalities and diseases etc. If you're a 90 year old niggress and you eat 2500 calories. You're going to gain weight. If you're a 17 year old White male and you eat 2500 calories. You're going to lose weight.

The thread about this yesterday was full of jew-lie after jew-lie after jew-lie.

Yes. Your metabolism (is only as fast as you make it, it's not set in stone) certainly changes the calories out half. But it's not a biological rule. It's a fundamental rule of reality.

"Calories Out" INCLUDES things like your age, race, metabolic conditions, disorders, genetic abnormalities and diseases etc. If you're a 90 year old niggress and you eat 2500 calories. You're going to gain weight. If you're a 17 year old White male and you eat 2500 calories. You're going to lose weight. The thread about this yesterday was full of jew-lie after jew-lie after jew-lie. Yes. Your metabolism (is only as fast as you make it, it's not set in stone) certainly changes the calories out half. But it's not a biological rule. It's a fundamental rule of reality.

(post is archived)

[–] -1 pt

Don't believe age plays a part. Older people generaly burn less because they have less muscle mass and are less active.

Both of which you take into account to measure what you burn.

Use your noggin, numpty.

[–] 0 pt

They're less active because their bodies are necessarily lowering their muscle mass to sustain important organs and functions. Muscle is "active tissue". The body needs to work to sustain it. So are organs. After ~30 years old the average male's body produces ~1% less testosterone per year. That lowers ability to be active. That lowers the body's ability to make and heal muscle tissue and other tissues as well.

They have less muscle mass because they're old. That's the rule. You're wrong. Dumbass.

[–] 0 pt

So you are agreeing with me?