It's not quite that simple. A diet of empty calories with few nutrients will make it more difficult to burn the calories consumed. Not enough protein and muscle mass will be lost, lowering resting metabolism. Lack of vitamins and essential elements will also slow metabolism. Sugar is easily metabolized. High protein diet uses more energy to digest. Calories in calories out is valid when a relatively balanced diet is being discussed.
> Calories in calories out is valid when a relatively balanced diet is being discussed.
Exactly, from my 'research.'
And here we have somoene who completely ignores what calories out means. It includes what the metabolism does, and will do, might do and has to do with the food. But he conveniently ignores it to claim it's not so simple when it is quite literally that simple.
Stop ignroing what calories out entails. It entails all of what you say is complex, which isn't complex. It's just more than your physical activity that people stupidly think is the only way calories out should be taken.
Calories in calories out is valid when a relatively balanced diet is being discussed.
No. Again. Always and forever valid.
That'd not how calories are measured. A calorie is a unit of energy. How it is metabolized is not a factor in measurement. Dumb nigger.
When in that post did I state how a calorie is measure? Please screenshot and outline so I know. I ask because I didn't.
You are just angry because you're a fat fuck and want to (((HAES))) poal like was done with voat.
(post is archived)