WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

838

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Beautiful face. It's easy to see that if she got closer to a normal body comp, she'd be gorgeous. It's frustrating that our society causes making the claim that a woman is overweight to become tantamount with saying he expects her to be a 105 lb rail. No, that's not the case at all. I don't even think she is remarkably overweight. Thirty pounds, 6 months, a little sacrifice, and she'd look and feel better. There is no model on earth who can honestly say they'd prefer to have +-sized as a prefix of their job title.

Do you all remember those picture books they used to have at barbers and salons, back in the day? They showed examples of hairstyles for men and women. Saying you want to be a +-sized model is like saying you want to be the bald person in those books. Nothing wrong with being bald, but we aren't holding it up as the 'model' hair style. That's not the point of a model. I think that's lost on these people. If you want to be fat, be fat. Whether it ought to be a crime is debatable, although I imagine some people here with an authoritarian bent would say, "Yes, it's a strain on society. It should be a crime." I guess if we get a new Reich, fine. I don't have the time or energy today to care about your health choices: if you are going to be fat, then be fucking fat, just stop expecting me or anybody else to glamorize it.

[–] 0 pt

There is no model on earth who can honestly say they'd prefer to have +-sized as a prefix of their job title.

Was Tyra Banks' fame being a plus sized model? From the times I was forced to watch her show, I gathered this was the case, though I also recall that her show explicitly defined plus-sized as 130 lbs.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I suppose it depends on how industry standards are changing. I also recall a time where larger models were still closer to what we'd call average human body types, but that was at a time when fashion models were these kind of sylvan oddities that didn't look normal. They all looked like they survived on celery and cocaine. It seems that the standards have been changing, but for the most part, the obese models tend to cluster in the lower end brands and department store catalogs. I think Sports Illustrated was one of the first to start making waves when Ashley Graham was included in the swimsuit edition several years back. Truly high end fashion doesn't seem to have budged much, in terms of recognizing + size in the common sense. So I guess what you're going to be exposed to depends on how rich you are. In the most recent years, fat isn't being accepted so much as it is being actively pushed by some outlets. I saw a Cosmo magazine cover recently with a legitimately obese black girl, featuring some caption about being healthy at any weight.

I get the real sense in all of this fat-culture of the elitism that we witness with other forms of virtue signaling: X for thee, but Y for me. They're going to give you the fat girls at the low-to-middle end, but I doubt if you will see many obese women on runways in Paris. It's not unlike the way rich progressives lobby for your neighborhood to accept blacks, while there isn't one to be found in theirs. It's the little people that are meant to bear the weight of moral progress (pun absolutely intended).

It's the difference between a multigenerational family unit providing and promoting beauty standards and the MSM doing the same, all in a world where the MSM can because nuclear families subverted it.

[–] 0 pt

I also recall a time where larger models were still closer to what we'd call average human body types, but that was at a time when fashion models were these kind of sylvan oddities that didn't look normal. They all looked like they survived on celery and cocaine.

The dark days when openly-homosexual fashion moguls wanted women who were "human hangers" so that they did not detract from their clothes? Frankly, I was always confused by that as how can you make clothes for women when they're not being marketed/designed for women with normal body types? Though the Eastern European women seem to embody this: tall, curveless, perpetual dour expression on their face, but I'm pretty sure that the latest in fashion was being tailored toward Eastern Europe.

Though I then heard, on the Nixon Tapes, ole "Tricky Dick" raging that the faggots had commandeered fashion in order to enact their conspiracy to make women ugly in the eyes of straight men. As with so many of his opinions stated on those tapes, he was probably right about that.

[–] 0 pt

30? I'd say 50. But everything else I'd agree with.

[–] 0 pt

She's 5'11”, 238. She could lose 50 and still be overweight. 100 is more like it.