Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

215

Would the demise of Greenpeace be a good thing, or is there a base level of good in some of their actions? Paying for "professional protestors" tends to put them in the scumbag category IMHO. Let them go bankrupt and reorganize into something better.

Deranged political activism claims another "victim". I sense a pattern here.

Would the demise of Greenpeace be a good thing, or is there a base level of good in some of their actions? Paying for "professional protestors" tends to put them in the scumbag category IMHO. Let them go bankrupt and reorganize into something better. Deranged political activism claims another "victim". I sense a pattern here.
[–] • 1 pt 29d

Lucis Trust is sponsored by among others Robert McNamara, former minister of Defence in the USA, president of the World Bank, member of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Thomas Watson (IBM, former ambassador in Moscow). Lucis Trust sponsors among others the following organizations: UN, Greenpeace Int., Greenpeace USA, Amnesty Int. and UNICEF.

The Lucis Trust (Lucifer's Trust) [11.25]
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HW2TCr1N9cGK/

[–] • 1 pt 29d

Repercussions are a bitch.

[–] • 1 pt last month

This is great. I think Greenpeace serves a purpose but I also think the pipeline is needed

[–] • 1 pt last month

Exactly. Greenpeace just needs a new leader and a giant enema to flush out all the shit. Checks and balances.