Any town with a nuclear reactor is engineered to irradiate you.
The facts say otherwise. The safest and most cost effective form of energy in common use by man.
In the past, sure. But companies have a lot of incentive to cut corners and no longer have any reason to care about the consequences if they cause a disaster. Far from it, they'd probably get a taxpayer bailout. Also those statistics are hardly relevant to these experimental gimmick mini-reactors.
The facts say otherwise. The safest and most cost effective form of energy in common use by man.
And vinyl chloride is used to make one of the safest and most cost effective plastics in common use by man.
It's never as simple as people want to make it out to be.
Energy is dangerous. This isn't news nor insightful. My comment remains accurate.
According to your logic, because people purposely use guns to kill people, it's not clear if we should have guns for self defense. It really is this clear and simple. Nuclear, when not using affirmative action, is safe. Obviously anything powerful can be abused or made needlessly more dangerous or expensive. Which is precisely what's happened with nuclear. But it doesn't change, and in spite of efforts, nuclear remains the safest power in common use and is required if you want to remain with a reliable power grid down the road.
(post is archived)