Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

333

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/net-energy-gain-us-scientists-makes-breakthrough-nuclear-fusion -> https://archive.md/WecM2

In my eyes this is how the sudden (((loss))) of $80 trillion will be explained away.

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/net-energy-gain-us-scientists-makes-breakthrough-nuclear-fusion -> https://archive.md/WecM2 In my eyes this is how the sudden (((loss))) of $80 trillion will be explained away.

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

So how long was the fusion reaction maintained? Half a second? A quarter of a second? Five seconds?

This article is such hype. Fusion power isn't cheap. It isn't even here yet, and the way things are going it may never arrive. If he does arrive it will be complex and expensive. If it were cheap and unlimited, there is no way in hell the elite would let us have it. Their plan is to starve us to death in the cold.

[–] • 0 pt

BANKSTER_COMMANDO's guide to if "OMG FUSION DID X" articles are true:

Hard evidence backing it up that's been independently reproduced? Yes + 100% true. No +5% chance true Is "climate" mentioned? -1% true per mention Is "carbon" mentioned (either carbon-neutral, zero-carbon,etc)? -1% true per mention (-2% true for this article) Is "net zero" mentioned? -1% true per mention (-2% for this article) Is "sustainable" mentioned? -1% true per mention (this article scores -1%)

Result for this article: 0% chance of being true.