“Going Green” may sound like a utopian ideal, but if you look at the hidden and embedded costs in a realistic and impartial way, you’ll find that “Going Green" does more damage to earth’s environment than it seems.
Well, duh. "Green" energy is far more polluting and environmentally destructive than conventional energy such as coal and natural gas.
>“Going Green” may sound like a utopian ideal, but if you look at the hidden and embedded costs in a realistic and impartial way, you’ll find that “Going Green" does more damage to earth’s environment than it seems.
Well, duh. "Green" energy is far more polluting and environmentally destructive than conventional energy such as coal and natural gas.
(post is archived)