I think that instead of using absolute costs in fossil fuel per turbine, it might have been more useful to talk about what the cost is like per kw.
So if I have a turbine that'll generate 100kw over it's lifetime, and it costs ~200T of carbon emissions to construct and put in place, then we know it costs .5T of co2 for every kw.
Also, I'm not sure it makes sense to call out the fossil fuels invested in making carbon fiber blades since the carbon isn't going to be released again (unless it goes on fire, which looks hilarious (youtube.com) when it happens btw).
Not that I particularly care about the carbon emissions scam, just trying to see what might redpill normies more.
I think that instead of using absolute costs in fossil fuel per turbine, it might have been more useful to talk about what the cost is like per kw.
So if I have a turbine that'll generate 100kw over it's lifetime, and it costs ~200T of carbon emissions to construct and put in place, then we know it costs .5T of co2 for every kw.
Also, I'm not sure it makes sense to call out the fossil fuels invested in making carbon fiber blades since the carbon isn't going to be released again (unless it goes on fire, which [looks hilarious](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onolsqdCnHA) when it happens btw).
Not that I particularly care about the carbon emissions scam, just trying to see what might redpill normies more.
(post is archived)