Did anyone notice the wireframe of the person behind the wall was rotated 90 degrees from his actual body position? That's not "seeing" you as much as it is using visual information along with some signal disturbances to estimate/predict where the person is. Let's see a second wireframe appear as someone who isn't already visible in the scene show up behind the wall and show that person's motion. I bet it doesn't work that way. And there are other ways to detect a person behind a wall that doesn't use WiFi to do it that actually shows better detail.
But could a zone hits be given to said subject?
But could a zone hits be given to said subject?
But either way it gives no detail and shows no indication of discerning a person from any other kind of movement. It's a very flawed project and there are definitely better methods of detecting humans and movement inside a structure.
Depends on the objective. If it’s for the government, at ruby ridge, none of that matters. Stick man in view, take the shot, get a metal.