Wow, I didn't realize they had shipped/built at that volume yet. Not bad for being a "new guy".
It's not really fair to call them "Linux" laptops since they are able to run Windows too so there is that...
Archive: https://archive.today/3E2Bs
From the post:
>Around 200,000 Linux computer systems from American computer maker Framework were shipped with signed UEFI shell components that could be exploited to bypass Secure Boot protections.
An attacker could take advantage to load bootkits (e.g. BlackLotus, HybridPetya, and Bootkitty) that can evade OS-level security controls and persist across OS re-installs.
Wow, I didn't realize they had shipped/built at that volume yet. Not bad for being a "new guy".
It's not really fair to call them "Linux" laptops since they are able to run Windows too so there is that...
Archive: https://archive.today/3E2Bs
From the post:
>>Around 200,000 Linux computer systems from American computer maker Framework were shipped with signed UEFI shell components that could be exploited to bypass Secure Boot protections.
An attacker could take advantage to load bootkits (e.g. BlackLotus, HybridPetya, and Bootkitty) that can evade OS-level security controls and persist across OS re-installs.
(post is archived)