Used HW is one of those things that I suggest contrary to - no provenance and thus no positive control of the supply chain. That said, buying new doesn't necessarily mean positive control either but I'd be more willing advocate for new. We can only do so much to ensure some level of cognizance of the HW builds, and industry is still struggling, but making some progress to identifying, enumering and socializing CPEs (Common Platform Enumerations) of known fuckery that could introduce an issue.
The flip-side is an educated user-base that actually knows the shit they buy and deploy; tracks known issues and implements mitigating controls. Know your supply chain - BOM that shit.
Yep. Cisco famously setup extremely complex shipping protocols for some clients (that paid more for it) specifically to avoid USA's Tailored access operations (TAO) intercepting the hardware in transit and either modifying the hardware entirely or replacing the firmware with a intentionally hijacked firmware.
It’s not compatible with DEI.
(post is archived)