I get it but it is a pain in the ass.
Archive: https://archive.today/hC1wa
From the post:
>What if one of the most fundamental security components of your business was secretly working against you? For years, the SSL certificate was a set-it-and-forget-it shield for your website, but a recent industry change has fundamentally altered that. The problem isn't the certificate itself—it's the manual process of managing a much shorter lifespan at scale. What was once an annual task is becoming a repetitive, error-prone burden.
You may have heard a lot of talk about a new 90-day SSL certificate lifespan. The industry has been heading in this direction for years. But the truth is, the situation is far more urgent. The official policy that was recently passed is designed to lead to even shorter lifespans, guaranteeing that the burden of manual certificate management will get worse—a lot worse.
I get it but it is a pain in the ass.
Archive: https://archive.today/hC1wa
From the post:
>>What if one of the most fundamental security components of your business was secretly working against you? For years, the SSL certificate was a set-it-and-forget-it shield for your website, but a recent industry change has fundamentally altered that. The problem isn't the certificate itself—it's the manual process of managing a much shorter lifespan at scale. What was once an annual task is becoming a repetitive, error-prone burden.
You may have heard a lot of talk about a new 90-day SSL certificate lifespan. The industry has been heading in this direction for years. But the truth is, the situation is far more urgent. The official policy that was recently passed is designed to lead to even shorter lifespans, guaranteeing that the burden of manual certificate management will get worse—a lot worse.
(post is archived)