They are also not stepping into each others arena.
One is a Japanese companie's product. One is a US based company.
I can see how they are not locked in a legal battle at this point.
While its easy to confuse the 2. Those who dont own or pay attention to subi, dont know they have a product named the same thing as a US company.
Big corps always seem to be sue-happy. I guess whatever works for them.
Its a trademark coverage (uspto.report) thing. There are multiple trademarks on "starlink" the word, by multiple companies.
Subi (uspto.report) had it earlier than SpaceEX (uspto.report), but it covers a different use than the SpaceEx version.
No idea why they are allowed to be exactly the same image in those 2 TM requests. I would have expected distinct logo or other characteristic between them.
(post is archived)