You have good instincts for cause and effect. Not a lot of people can distinguish between a gut check, and the cause of their gut check.
If you're expecting what they're expecting it means you're keyed in to what they're worried about.
Seems like the u.s. government, for all the confidence it projects, isn't all that confident about its basic abilities to defend its own infrastructure, and maybe has some sort of backup policies it would push through if it failed. Never let a good crisis go to waste and all that.
Also explains the huge push over the last ten years or so, besides make-work, for cybersecurity degrees/recruits. And that makes even more sense in light of how absurdly effective drones were shown to be in the recent armenian conflict. Cyber and infrastructure would be a huge component of a new accelerated drone-based orientation to mass conflict.
Ah yes. Knowledge of jamming and making EMPs is not that complicated. Also, "hidden camera detectors" and "bug detector" abilities can be magnified applied to detect drones from a long way away.
Also, "hidden camera detectors" and "bug detector" abilities can be magnified applied to detect drones from a long way away.
Now thats interesting.
I know there are studies to detect tornados before they form based on their "inaudible" infrasound signature. I wonder if the same is possible with drones? I figure military drones are already designed with a small IR and radar profile, and some are designed to be hard for people to hear. But "hard for people to hear" is different from "hard for microphones to detect."
The noise profiles are classified, but yes. Acoustic detection is very easily accomplished.
You can build one very inexpensively, with a phantom powered microphone with the signal put through an FX processor and manually listen. If you have the noise profiles, you can automate it.
(post is archived)