Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

924

What kind of stupid title is this? No shit, not only can most people not afford $3500 on a VR/AR headset you look like a fucking moron with it on and I can't see any real benefits at this point.

Apple did just fine as a "status symbol" company for a long time (due to morons) but I don't think that is a thing anymore and a huge amount of people that bought these ended up returning them to the point that they changed the 90 day policy to a 30 day policy and started requiring people to try them out in-store before buying them.

Archive: https://archive.today/15eQV

From the post:

>Apple's $3,499 Vision Pro headset has failed to gain widespread adoption despite advanced technology, with consumers preferring discreet wearables like smartwatches.

What kind of stupid title is this? No shit, not only can most people not afford $3500 on a VR/AR headset you look like a fucking moron with it on and I can't see any real benefits at this point. Apple did just fine as a "status symbol" company for a long time (due to morons) but I don't think that is a thing anymore and a huge amount of people that bought these ended up returning them to the point that they changed the 90 day policy to a 30 day policy and started requiring people to try them out in-store before buying them. Archive: https://archive.today/15eQV From the post: >>Apple's $3,499 Vision Pro headset has failed to gain widespread adoption despite advanced technology, with consumers preferring discreet wearables like smartwatches.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt 3mo

At 3500$, no kidding.

[–] • 1 pt 3mo

I don't know what they expected? For that cost, it is amazing they bothered to go to market at all but I guess they were hoping the "trendy" factor or something was going to boost sales. Hell, I would not spend $500 on one USED.

[–] • 1 pt 3mo

They expected the Jobbsian Faithful to buy it.

[–] • 1 pt 3mo

It's not a company, It's a cult.