WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K
Lots of people think it's the future, people walking around with windows in front of them. People on the subway typing. $3,500 units flying off the shelves. Personally I think it's sad. People glued to a screen even when walking. Looking like a drone from the future. Must consume media every second of the day. I fucking hate it. And yeah, I know "then don't buy it". I won't. Just expressing an opinion. Here's a sample of of one of the 'viral' videos of it. People think this is amazing. I think it's sad. The dystopia gets worse https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV9Xy6L_rlM

Lots of people think it's the future, people walking around with windows in front of them. People on the subway typing. $3,500 units flying off the shelves.

Personally I think it's sad. People glued to a screen even when walking. Looking like a drone from the future. Must consume media every second of the day. I fucking hate it. And yeah, I know "then don't buy it". I won't. Just expressing an opinion.

Here's a sample of of one of the 'viral' videos of it. People think this is amazing. I think it's sad. The dystopia gets worse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV9Xy6L_rlM

I think it's the future, get used to it. I want one
I hate it
Don't worry. It's a gimmick and owners won't use them after 2 weeks
Fuck You!

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I wouldn't be so sure if somebody can make a profit licensing all that information in a program they will do it, and i think mechanics nation wide would be willing to pay 2 grand for a VR/AR set and 1200 a year to license the software, if it represents a time saving on average of just 12% it would be worth it but you could tie the program to a distributor network so you can order a spare part with a gesture that could save hundreds of man hours in a year.

Are chilton manuals still a thing? Because the nerds who make forza or some other aim racing franchise should get together with chilton or the like to produce this product. I bet the military would love to buy the tech and get some similar software, same with the air travel industry.

There's gold in the there hills.

Do you know how much money police departments pay to license AI to monitor body cams? It's exorbitant.

The bottleneck after consumers is in quality programers with tertiary interests and knowledgebases.

[–] 1 pt

On a side note. Have you looked at the rabbit R1?

>mechanics nation wide would be willing to pay 2 grand for a VR/AR set and 1200 a year to license the software, if it represents a time saving on average of just 12% it would be worth it but you could tie the program to a distributor network so you can order a spare part with a gesture

Rabbit is doing what it calls the LAM (Large Action Model) Its a LLM, that can actually do shit for you.... hey rabbit, order me an uber here for 6 people... one of his demo lines...

Give it a look, it is also sort of game changing in the smartphone / AI arena.

[–] 1 pt

I agree. It will be high end tuning and custom shops who buy this sort of tech first, and it will be ridiculously expensive, and require yearly subscription fees, to get updated information on the new models. It would be far more useful in the middle end shops, as those are the techs who would need more help. Those shops will be priced out of the tech initially.

Eventually it will get cheaper and the home user will be able to get into it for a few hundred bucks (whatever that comparison will be then in todays dollar)... That is when it becomes game changing. (not specifically mechanic software, but the types of software we are discussing - that high end extremely useful software. (planes/heli, train, electronic circuit design, mechanical engineering design in real 3d space...)

Yes the bottleneck will be programming. With the latest AI models, that is scaling up quickly, well written series of prompts are doing wonders to get the basics and even much of the tuning done in one off small apps and scripts already. It isnt ready to make UI that humans would really use that I have seen yet though.

Yeah Chilton manuals are still a thing, as well as the competitor Haynes. Yes there is money in this, I havent yet looked into an SDK for it. The wife and I are still busy working on tuning a LLM. I should probably make that a priority. However from my understanding, a lot of the smartphone apps will work already its just in the display of it, it is altered. So apps designed to take specific advantage of this space would be where the money is.

Old type smart phone app dev will probably fall off a cliff in a few years in favor of dev specifically for this.