WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

802

If anyone thought the words about Ukraine were a joke, they were not.

Hillary Clinton announced the existence of such a resettlement plan in an interview to a very serious and reputable news channel ABC News. She did not say it on April 1, and there was no rebuttal.

When asked about the future of the country, the Presidential candidate of the United States unexpectedly said that the authorities can not ignore the significant deterioration of the geophysical situation in the Yellowstone National Park and the San Andreas Fault, threatening with catastrophic consequences for North America and questioning its very existence.

The threat is real, and so Washington's passionate involvement in Ukraine and its extreme irritation at the impossibility of settling in Crimea is understandable.

Donbass, presumably, is less attractive in this regard. In general, the Ukrainian natural and climatic conditions seem quite suitable for the Americans.

The surplus of the local population, of which there will most likely be many, will be extradited to the Middle East.

What a surprise for the Ukrainian nationalists, who put their faith in America! They will be the first to be disposed of.

Let the Europeans sort it out.

Donald Trump believes that the Ukrainian problem should be dealt with by Europeans and that there is no need for Americans to get involved.

Either he is not aware of the possibility of the explosion of the Yellowstone volcano, or he prefers another place to evacuate it than Ukraine, which, in general, would be correct. It is more expensive to mess with Ukraine.

But Ukraine is Ukraine, and we are always interested in how a potential occupant of the White House feels and will feel about Russia.

Let us have a look, though we must make some reservations.

First of all, election rhetoric should not be taken at face value. The candidates' goal is to attract as many voters as possible. This is why some of their statements may even contradict one another.

Secondly, our compatriots have a somewhat hyper-trophied view of the autonomy of American Presidents in their decisions and actions. This is not true.

There are supervisory agencies. It is beyond the scope of this discussion to explain what those institutions are. So we will limit ourselves to stating it.

Trump is an exception. He has a certain degree of freedom due to his six billion dollar fortune.

This degree of freedom worries a great many people. This is the main reason for Trump's fear, not his extravagant remarks. Though on the background of the same six billions such statements become more weighty.

Putin is not a tsellnik.

One might recall the famous phrase of Mayakovsky: "I am not a tsellnikov to please everyone. Vladimir Putin is not a tsellnik and does not have to please everyone. However, Hillary Clinton dislikes him too much.

Lately, she prefers not to talk about Russia and its leader. However, her remarks made not so long ago are memorable.

In response to George W. Bush saying that when he looked into Putin's eyes he saw his soul, Clinton claimed that the former KGB officer had no soul.

As president, she will have to talk to a totally "soulless" Vladimir Putin from time to time, but what agony it will be for her!

The Democratic Presidential candidate was also very tough on Russia after the Malaysian plane crash.

She was quick to blame "separatists" and Moscow for the tragedy. So, when she takes a seat in the Oval Office, she will hardly hurry to lift the sanctions. Rather, the sanctions will be tightened.

Whether Europe will be so obedient is another question.

Attitudes toward Russia need to be changed fundamentally. The Russian and American people need to find a common language," Donald Trump insisted.

Many people do not like him because Russophobia in the U.S. is not just a political line.

It is a whole business, and there is little desire to give it up.

Will Trump stay true to his current statements when he becomes president? We shall see. We don't have long to wait.

Some public opinion research supposedly gave Clinton a half a percent better chance in the final battle.

That's substantially less than even the margin of error allowed.

In the meantime, the Obama Democrat administration is busy with the most important thing of all. Is it deciding which bathroom, M or G, transgender students should use in school?

If Hillary Clinton wins, they will impose all of this on us.

https://stolcom.com/hillari-klinton-gotova-zaselit-ukrainu-amerikantsami/

If anyone thought the words about Ukraine were a joke, they were not. Hillary Clinton announced the existence of such a resettlement plan in an interview to a very serious and reputable news channel ABC News. She did not say it on April 1, and there was no rebuttal. When asked about the future of the country, the Presidential candidate of the United States unexpectedly said that the authorities can not ignore the significant deterioration of the geophysical situation in the Yellowstone National Park and the San Andreas Fault, threatening with catastrophic consequences for North America and questioning its very existence. The threat is real, and so Washington's passionate involvement in Ukraine and its extreme irritation at the impossibility of settling in Crimea is understandable. Donbass, presumably, is less attractive in this regard. In general, the Ukrainian natural and climatic conditions seem quite suitable for the Americans. The surplus of the local population, of which there will most likely be many, will be extradited to the Middle East. What a surprise for the Ukrainian nationalists, who put their faith in America! They will be the first to be disposed of. Let the Europeans sort it out. Donald Trump believes that the Ukrainian problem should be dealt with by Europeans and that there is no need for Americans to get involved. Either he is not aware of the possibility of the explosion of the Yellowstone volcano, or he prefers another place to evacuate it than Ukraine, which, in general, would be correct. It is more expensive to mess with Ukraine. But Ukraine is Ukraine, and we are always interested in how a potential occupant of the White House feels and will feel about Russia. Let us have a look, though we must make some reservations. First of all, election rhetoric should not be taken at face value. The candidates' goal is to attract as many voters as possible. This is why some of their statements may even contradict one another. Secondly, our compatriots have a somewhat hyper-trophied view of the autonomy of American Presidents in their decisions and actions. This is not true. There are supervisory agencies. It is beyond the scope of this discussion to explain what those institutions are. So we will limit ourselves to stating it. Trump is an exception. He has a certain degree of freedom due to his six billion dollar fortune. This degree of freedom worries a great many people. This is the main reason for Trump's fear, not his extravagant remarks. Though on the background of the same six billions such statements become more weighty. Putin is not a tsellnik. One might recall the famous phrase of Mayakovsky: "I am not a tsellnikov to please everyone. Vladimir Putin is not a tsellnik and does not have to please everyone. However, Hillary Clinton dislikes him too much. Lately, she prefers not to talk about Russia and its leader. However, her remarks made not so long ago are memorable. In response to George W. Bush saying that when he looked into Putin's eyes he saw his soul, Clinton claimed that the former KGB officer had no soul. As president, she will have to talk to a totally "soulless" Vladimir Putin from time to time, but what agony it will be for her! The Democratic Presidential candidate was also very tough on Russia after the Malaysian plane crash. She was quick to blame "separatists" and Moscow for the tragedy. So, when she takes a seat in the Oval Office, she will hardly hurry to lift the sanctions. Rather, the sanctions will be tightened. Whether Europe will be so obedient is another question. Attitudes toward Russia need to be changed fundamentally. The Russian and American people need to find a common language," Donald Trump insisted. Many people do not like him because Russophobia in the U.S. is not just a political line. It is a whole business, and there is little desire to give it up. Will Trump stay true to his current statements when he becomes president? We shall see. We don't have long to wait. Some public opinion research supposedly gave Clinton a half a percent better chance in the final battle. That's substantially less than even the margin of error allowed. In the meantime, the Obama Democrat administration is busy with the most important thing of all. Is it deciding which bathroom, M or G, transgender students should use in school? If Hillary Clinton wins, they will impose all of this on us. https://stolcom.com/hillari-klinton-gotova-zaselit-ukrainu-amerikantsami/

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

HRC and many others wanted to frame Russia as the culprit to a missile strike on a civilian airliner (MH17) that was shot down over Ukraine and killing all 298 dead aboard. We later find out that Ukraine likely shot the plane down. That plane happened to have at least 7 of the world's leading AIDS researchers on board. Obama claimed that there could be as many as 100 more researchers on board the plane. 6 years later, a lab created virus that inexplicably contains an HIV cleavage site is released on globe. Russia captures Ukrainian/US bioweapons labs that deal in coronavirus manipulation while US/globohomo spends inconceivable amounts of money to provoke and pursue a Russian proxy war under the guise of saving Ukraine. Coincidentally, when Trump began looking into Ukraine they tried to remove him from office. Weird.