>It's the preponderance of evidence, the totality, not just a few isolated things here and there. Paul McCartney didn't die and was replaced and there is literally zero evidence of that. Just a lot of people making some shekels and getting some thrills making absurd shit up and seeing how many people believe it. >There is. Sound analysis, DNA evidence, height difference, etc. Otherwise I'm a gullible idiot (which is what my wife calls me). It takes two things to find the truth. Interest, and time. No, there is not. Shall I post another video of sound analysis that disproves this nonsense? I have seen a lot of this "evidence" that "proves" Paul was replaced and it is half baked bullshit like the Ancient Aliens shows. Hell, you'd know better if you were into the music scene and ever tried to find a bass player for a band! lol