Devil's advocate: If the eco-globalist alliance (the georgia set) want to affect change First, some considerations: The importation of people from the third world may make it easier to propagandize the population, but the lower the mean IQ the more people tend to respond to things they don't understand by using violence. If you don't believe me, look at the black-populated cities. Failure to integrate. The short term chaos may be worth it for consolidating political control, but I think it is a net drain on the mid and long term. New policing technologies will have to be invented as the west becomes less stable. These include predictive policing, methods of measuring criminal inclination, and determining criminal intent. Even newer technologies will likely implement voice stress analysis, word-usage vs common patterns, eye tracking, and possibly a hundred other variables, too many to list. It is not unreasonable to suggest that in perhaps 10-25 years that this technology will not only be used by you, on the public, but be opensourced and reinvented, becoming ubiquitous. It will be a sort of information 'arms race' between closed and open systems. At this stage, you won't be able to *effectively* hide your public-facing puppets in office, in finance, and everywhere else. There *are* some solutions to this predicament, but none that come without a cost, and none that are 100% effective. I've looked at potential approaches myself. In short, you're on borrowed time. While full blown collapse is not desired, many smaller collapses, or 'managed decline' may be desirable for softening people. The public lacks awareness of how the world currently works, and in fact their expected reaction to the full realization of the truth, would likely undermine the system. And yet the current system, allowed to continue without course correction, is dying. This much is obvious. The essential problem at the foundation of this dilemma, is that existing governance (both the real variety, *and* the public illusory variety), are not impartial, and this is drastically undermining both the *actual* quality and the *perceived* quality of world governance. How can nations, or their supernational descendant regions, be expected to follow anything *but* the judgement of a superior entity if that entity does not exercise superior discrimination and universal impartiality? The human element, and human interest, pursuits, and considerations, have contaminated the decisionmaking process. The fact is, for all their bitching, most people, both the variety in every day life, and the doomer variety, would not like, and do not want, a collapse or catastrophic failure of the existing order. Too many are dependent on it. But the implacability is inspired by the conspicuity of the imperfection of leadership and its own decadence apparent or real. This is the heart of it. It stands to reason, if billions of lives are at stake, or even civilization as we know it, then it makes no sense to burn it all down or attempt a transition without a clear system in place to replace it. While there may be such a replacement planned, people's very lack of awareness of it will inspire pushback in many nations, as we are already starting to witness. With the right data I could have seen this from a mile away with my eyes shut. These are just the beginning rumblings, I assure you. The *material conditions* of the populace the world over must continue to decline, but not so quickly that they inspire *material resistance*. Currently this decline is being slow walked, which at first appearance, is the correct approach. But having examined it, what it appears to be is someone or multiple someones covering over incompetence or semicompetence by feigning a cautionary stance to the global plan. Once you see it, you cannot unsee it. This very likely means that if, or more precisely *when*, any major element goes sideways, they will *also* slowwalk a response, or fail to respond correctly. The global situation *will* grow out of control given current junior leadership and steering. While megawealth is, generally, a very efficient measure of the mean and their craft, the existing order has been metastasized from within, trading craft for mere cunning. In other words, global order is struggling (though not outright failing at this time) due to a combination of a failure of imagination, and the iron law of oligarchy. You have insiders promoting insiders, which is effective for solidarity in the short term, but which is severely impacting decision making. Secondary concerns are polluting high level details, and high level agendas are not in their turn, fully steering secondaries. If you are on a river, paddling, and you are not moving, you may perceive you are making progress at first, when in fact you are losing or have lost momentum. This is that. I recommend a purge, not merely of the base population, but of the lower level 'elites' as well. In light of everything, and despite my own misgivings, there can be no doubt this is the correct course for world governance. I recommend this without any consideration at all to my own opinions or prior hostility I have to the existing system. This opinion is given without bias or reservation to ethics, or justice, or morality. Civilization is a bonsai tree. For world governance to grow, *it must first be pruned*.