In the spirit of the flat earth and space is fake bullshit, there are two things I'm not sure about:
1) Did we fake the moon landing? Seems plausible, we were at the height of cold war propaganda and the bankers wanted to make the US seem superior to Russia. The moon rover looks like a grade school arts and crafts experiment with popsicle sticks and tinfoil.
2) Douglas Vogt and others claim that the sun micronovas every ~12k years while the earth's rotation changes. The original book the CIA banned was "the adam and eve story" by Thomas Chan - he theorized that when the earth's poles reverse, the rotation of the earth tilts 90 degrees as the heavier poles move to the equator. Chan's version makes sense, and would cause tidal waves that explain the erosion you can see in the continental shelf on google earth. But is there any hard evidence of the micronova? There are petroglyphs that look like plasma toroids that are drawn with the perspective of people on different parts of the world looking at the same point in the sky, which is convincing. Vogt and others claim NASA found fission tracks and isotopes on the moon and earth that can only be explained by massive radiation... but how do we know this came from a micronova? Researching this would explain a strong desire to get to the moon and take samples and first hand observation as well.
I'ld like to learn more about these two things.
In the spirit of the flat earth and space is fake bullshit, there are two things I'm not sure about:
1) Did we fake the moon landing? Seems plausible, we were at the height of cold war propaganda and the bankers wanted to make the US seem superior to Russia. The moon rover looks like a grade school arts and crafts experiment with popsicle sticks and tinfoil.
2) Douglas Vogt and others claim that the sun micronovas every ~12k years while the earth's rotation changes. The original book the CIA banned was "the adam and eve story" by Thomas Chan - he theorized that when the earth's poles reverse, the rotation of the earth tilts 90 degrees as the heavier poles move to the equator. Chan's version makes sense, and would cause tidal waves that explain the erosion you can see in the continental shelf on google earth. But is there any hard evidence of the micronova? There are petroglyphs that look like plasma toroids that are drawn with the perspective of people on different parts of the world looking at the same point in the sky, which is convincing. Vogt and others claim NASA found fission tracks and isotopes on the moon and earth that can only be explained by massive radiation... but how do we know this came from a micronova? Researching this would explain a strong desire to get to the moon and take samples and first hand observation as well.
I'ld like to learn more about these two things.
(post is archived)