![Some comparisons with Tarrant and Gendron [4061x1569 - 3.53MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/9BmMa4.png){kind=link}
Not letting people leech off you any more is accelerating things to the extreme. Anyone who can't fend for themselves dies off.
Killing a few people does nothing if you don't stop the root cause.
You sound like a fucking potato defending this tard.
Killing a few people does nothing if you don't stop the root cause.
You clearly haven't read the manifesto, by having the leftist media become outraged at the use of AR-15's and combat armor the goal is to push comfortable people on the right to form militias and fight for their rights once they come for their guns.
You sound like a fucking potato defending this tard.
You sound pretty butthurt over the fact that 8 niggers, a mudshark and a spic were killed. Nothing of value was lost in the world.
Yes, exactly, NOTHING OF VALUE WAS LOST.
If you're going to waste your life trying to be some white man ally bollocks do something useful on the way out.
If it's a FBI glowie job and the kid is a crypto jew then he isn't going to be spending time in jail, he will be relocated with Epstein.
Anyone who can't fend for themselves dies off.
There's a potential for passivity that sets this strategy apart from accelerationism, what you describe here is more of a mix between non-participation and survivalism, that's not exactly what accelerationism strictly refers to while I see how it could be construed as such
Accelerationism has to be the deliberate act of promoting bad outcomes that the system produces, in order to cripple it with the shit of its own making, it's the promotion of systemic suicide you could say. Accelerationism, as an ideology, is transitory by nature, because if you make it permanent then you become genocidal NWO, hence the grey area where glownigs and accelerationists meet
Just like anarchy, accelerationism is supposed to be a means to an end, not a permanent state of things
(post is archived)