Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

648

I was always baffled by the people who try to claim that no planes were flown into the towers when all evidence says otherwise.

The pentagon was hit by a missile and no, sand niggers were not capable of flying those planes nor were they needed to.

So, anyone want to challenge my claim?

EDIT: Also, try gathering any of that information on System Planning Corp today, when I compiled that Voat thread I had to use internet archive as SPC had freshly scrubbed their webpage of any history linking them to such technology.

I was always baffled by the people who try to claim that no planes were flown into the towers when all evidence says otherwise. The pentagon was hit by a missile and no, sand niggers were not capable of flying those planes nor were they needed to. So, anyone want to challenge my claim? EDIT: Also, try gathering any of that information on System Planning Corp today, when I compiled that Voat thread I had to use internet archive as SPC had freshly scrubbed their webpage of any history linking them to such technology.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Agree, disagree, agree.

There's an appx. 18-part video series that convinced me that the Pentagon was actually hit by an airliner. I was on the other side of the fence for quite some time but those videos make an extremely good case for the plane vs. the missile theory.

Found one of my original posts: https://searchvoat.co/v/Conspiracy/3184126

Jewtube playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbO7FuVJPzY&list=PLQDv-sbExGyUlhn_ir15tet5HAGM_eCBA

2nd source: https://911speakout.org/wayne-coste/

[–] • 1 pt

I'm not too hung up on the pentagon being hit by a plane or missile, the main thing keeping me on the fence is the trajectory in which the plane would have had to flown.

But that was several years ago and i'm keen on watching the video you linked to challenge that view and either change mine accordingly or come back at you with factual reasoning.

This is the kind of dialogue I was hoping for. Cheers.

[–] • 1 pt

In Colorado Springs Air Force base was a whole team working in secret making passenger jets remote controlled. This was leading up to 911. After, every guy in that hanger died by various ‘natural means’ within a month or so. They were real people, they had names and families and friends. Some I’ve known since I was a small child. I won’t list their names here because they still have friends and family alone, but conversations were had pre 911 about the crazy assignment they all had.

[–] • 1 pt

Thank you and I am now with you in that all of the attacks were orchestrated using remote controlled jets.

It makes sense too, why risk using a missile when they can precisely fly the jets, plus the precision of hitting the budget analyst department of the pentagon in which they were working on where trillions of dollars had been spent. Poof. Vanished with 9/11 haha

[–] • -1 pt

The mechanics of the official 9-11 narrative are largely true. Planes hit the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Those planes were flown by terrorists from the Middle East, mostly from Saudi Arabia. There was no missile. There was no remote control of the aircraft. The Twin Towers fell down due to the fires caused by jet fuel. Building Five fell because it caught fire when the Twin Towers were hit. They were all built the same way, and they all failed in the same way. The Pentagon was hit by a passenger jet -- there is no question at all about this.

It's really silly to dispute these basic facts. Unless you are deliberately trying to sow confusion and uncertainty, all it does is make you seem unintelligent. You are a flat-earther, but with a different mania.

Where the conspiracy of 9-11 comes in is the question of how much did Isreal know before the attacks? How much involvement in the planning and execution of the attacks did Israel have? Was the administration of George W. Bush in the know about Israel's involvement, and did Israel tell Bush beforehand when the attack on the Twin Towers was going to occur?

[–] • 0 pt

It's really silly to dispute these basic facts.

The basic facts are this :

Dov Zakheim - From 1987–2001, Zakheim was CEO of SPC International - During the 2000 U.S. Presidential election campaign, Zakheim served as a foreign policy advisor to George W. Bush as part of a group led by Condoleezza Rice that called itself The Vulcans.

SPC International - The Flight Termination System (FTS) is a fully redundant turn-key range safety and test system for remote control and flight termination of airborne test vehicles.

https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/techreviews/2001/10/2/remote-pilot.htm

This is a scalable context timeline. It contains events related to the event August 2001: Large Passenger Jet Flown and Landed by Remote Control.

The facts are there that point towards remote control aircraft. You are the flat earther by trying to insist illiterate sand niggers flew those jets.

Included were 2 examples of much older timestamps of the US military using Drone aircraft. The 1940's

Operation Aphrodite (US Army Air Forces) & Operation Anvil (US Navy) made use of unmanned, explosive-laden Army Air Forces Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress and Navy PB4Y-1 Liberator bombers that were deliberately crashed into their targets under radio control.