Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

399

The whole thing is just an advertising stunt, someone else has the manufacturing and logistics of actually making and shipping the product. If it tanks, it's only cost a few commercials. I estimate that they have spent less than 100k on the whole media blitz. And the reported pre-order numbers indicate they've already seen $2,000,000 come in.

It wreaks for the usual (((obvious))) reasons, but I bet we will find somebody playing both sides on this one.

The whole thing is just an advertising stunt, someone else has the manufacturing and logistics of actually making and shipping the product. If it tanks, it's only cost a few commercials. I estimate that they have spent less than 100k on the whole media blitz. And the reported pre-order numbers indicate they've already seen $2,000,000 come in. It wreaks for the usual (((obvious))) reasons, but I bet we will find somebody playing both sides on this one.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (6).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I thought the point here was to not support woke companies.

"Gillette Makes Waves With Controversial New Ad Highlighting 'Toxic Masculinity'"

https://time.com/5503156/gillette-razors-toxic-masculinity/

Sure it's a petty move on my part that doesn't make a difference, but my goal is to not send my money to faggots. Plus I feel dirty inside when I patronize known subversives.

[–] • 0 pt

I don't think Gillette makes much money if I buy a 40-80 year old handle from an antiques shop or ebay, and those things last forever.