It's also why the Fed doesn't want inflation low. High inflation drives people to spend money now before it becomes less valuable.
Meh. You are not wrong, but there is more to it. It's more than speed of transaction, it's also about dilution of value.
Think of it this way:
- You own a house, purchased for $100K. There is an equal house in the next neighborhood for $100K.
- 10 years later, you decide to sell your house and move to that equal house. Now (thanks to inflation) both houses are worth $500K.
- Congrats, now you own house #2, but you still own only a single house. Your utility hasn't improved.
- But, now you owe ~$80K in taxes on the $400K 'gain' (inflation) on the first house.
- You are ~20% poorer and have no additional assets. The government wins - they got 20% of your wealth; and the banks win - you will have to come up with that 20% on a loan from the bank.
- And, this is ignoring transaction fees, local taxes, etc.which just makes it worse.
Inflation is only good for two groups: banks and government. The Fed is owned by the banks, so there will always be enough inflation to debase your capital (savings) but not so much as to cause a panic or political unrest.
No capital gains on your primary residence but yes, you are correct.
I stand corrected. TY!
But, now you owe ~$80K in taxes on the $400K 'gain' (inflation) on the first house.
No you don't. Capital gains on a primary residence are exempt from taxation as long as they're used to purchase another primary residence within two years.
However, in high value areas like California you get royally fucked on property taxes. The prices of houses in California is more like you bought a house in 2015 for $600,000 and then decide to sell it for an equivalent house in 2022, but now each house is worth $1.1 million. Your property taxes go from $625 a month to $1,145 a month.
I stand corrected. TY!
(post is archived)