As usual you speak out of your ass.
Is there anything you "know" which is true?
As usual you speak out of your ass.
Is there anything you "know" which is true?
No, there were Hebrew and Latin scholars in the Reformation that knew what the words meant and still believed it to be days.
This was the factual statement I made that you denied. You contradicted what I said and stated that these scholars believed it to be understood as "metaphorical."
The argument is not whether it was literal days or not, it was whether many theologians believed it to be literal days or not.
What is it you don't understand and that I'm "talking out of my ass"? These are facts, I've studied theology for over thirty years.
> No, there were Hebrew and Latin scholars in the Reformation that knew what the words meant and still believed it to be days.
This was the factual statement I made that you denied. You contradicted what I said and stated that these scholars believed it to be understood as "metaphorical."
The argument is not whether it was literal days or not, it was whether many theologians believed it to be literal days or not.
What is it you don't understand and that I'm "talking out of my ass"? These are facts, I've studied theology for over thirty years.
(post is archived)