Right because I'm basing the whole thing on a few video clips.
>I dont care about the Beatles
Not the point.
Then share better proof.like I said.
What obligates me to do that?
I'm showing you another thing we've been lied to about. It's your prerogative to research it.
Which conspiracy that you eventually came to grips with and accepted as true didn't seem insane to you at first?
It takes two things to learn the truth, about anything. Time and interest.
If you're not interested you won't pursue it. Fine. Perhaps you're interested but just don't have the time.
I hear "I don't give a damn about the Beatles" when I present this, but that's not the point.
The point is Tavistock's engaging in chicanery and social engineering to achieve an evil agenda. It's important. It shows their power and ability (over the masses).
If you're interested (and are able to accept the cog dissonance and 'take-down' of your / others idols) then here's some links. If not, then I haven't wasted any real significant time and others just might be, or get, interested.
https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAW3gU1yflm-4btJQPQwhb-aJvcTNEryZ
(See his entire catalog, you tube channel, this (above) is just the first one that pops up.)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bETIejhQZvo
Do you really think this is the original Paul McCartney?
That is a leftist argumentative fallacy you used, saying you don't have to prove your statement or back it up with evidence. I would highly suggest not arguing that route for anything as it is really dumb.
When I have a few minutes I will look at these other links you provided. Maybe there will be some damning evidence in there. I'm not saying you are right or wrong. I'm saying the original proofs you espoused weren't proofs. Maybe these will be. Tanks for sharing.
(post is archived)