Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

193

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

I tried watching the Beatles four-part documentary by Peter Jackson, but after one episode I stopped. I discovered that I no longer gave a flying fuck about the Beatles. I never liked them when I was a teenager (I liked Jefferson Airplane, Iron Butterfly, King Crimson, Pink Floyd), and I like them even less today. They were all pretentious twats, with the possible exception of George, who only came into his own after they broke up.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, I agree, I only dug them when they first came on the scene, but I was a kid.

[–] • 1 pt

I believe

[–] • 1 pt

It's plain to see once you really look into it, I thought it was insane at first, it's not at all.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

There is no proof because it didn't happen.

[–] • 1 pt

There's overwhelming proof. It is just difficult to look.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

No, there is literally zero proof.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

There's an abundance of proof. If you're not interested that's fine, don't trouble yourself.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )
[–] • 1 pt

George Harrison was the onky one with talent

[–] • 1 pt

The guy who replaced Paul though was a studio musician.

Definitely George was the only likable one.

[–] • 0 pt

I dont care about the Beatles and I don't care about Paul McCartney, but none of this is "proof". He could've been saying "william" as a named goodbye to any of the people in the room and Paul happened to turn around to ask his question. Both of your other videos are garbled nonsense. The Harrison one could just as easily been "hello you" and the woman could've said just about anything. If you have good proof of your theories by all means share it but this is all bullshit nothingburgers.

[–] • 0 pt

Right because I'm basing the whole thing on a few video clips.

>I dont care about the Beatles

Not the point.

[–] • 0 pt

Then share better proof.like I said.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

What obligates me to do that?

I'm showing you another thing we've been lied to about. It's your prerogative to research it.

Which conspiracy that you eventually came to grips with and accepted as true didn't seem insane to you at first?

It takes two things to learn the truth, about anything. Time and interest.

If you're not interested you won't pursue it. Fine. Perhaps you're interested but just don't have the time.

I hear "I don't give a damn about the Beatles" when I present this, but that's not the point.

The point is Tavistock's engaging in chicanery and social engineering to achieve an evil agenda. It's important. It shows their power and ability (over the masses).

If you're interested (and are able to accept the cog dissonance and 'take-down' of your / others idols) then here's some links. If not, then I haven't wasted any real significant time and others just might be, or get, interested.

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAW3gU1yflm-4btJQPQwhb-aJvcTNEryZ

(See his entire catalog, you tube channel, this (above) is just the first one that pops up.)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bETIejhQZvo

Do you really think this is the original Paul McCartney?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh48KD-3aMc

[–] • 0 pt

Great, another schizopost.

[–] • 0 pt

You guys are really behind on some things.

It's okay, simply dismiss it as schizo, as normies would about Sandy Hook and 9/11 and the OKC bombings and let's see....

Stay comfy.

[–] • 0 pt

You are totally correct, I am sooooo behind on this fake Beatle thing. I’ve totally never seen the bucket filled with bullshit and retardation that is the whole ‘Fake Paul’ conspiracy.

I’m not behind on this, friendo…. I just don’t believe a fucking word of it. Oh and by all means, go ahead and tie Fake Beatle in with Sandy Hook, 9/11 and OKC, it doesn’t make you look fucky at all.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

> I’ve totally never seen the bucket filled with bullshit and retardation that is the whole ‘Fake Paul’ conspiracy.

Do you know how arrogant and stupid that sounds? You've 'never seen it' but you know the truth.

Like I said, you're not interested. So move along. This isn't for you.

>I just don’t believe a fucking word of it.

There's a reason you don't, and it's not because you've researched it.