Generally, they say I didn't "include links." Whether I have any links, or not. If I press them on it, they then say I need to adhere to Rule 3: "Clarity" which means I need to explain the links. With posts limited to 10,000 characters, it is literally impossible for me to include sources in a single post, but the rule is that all the sources must fit in the post. Like trying to prove Pizzagate on Twitter. It's obnoxious. A few years ago, they asked for people to submit a summary of Pizzagate for a sticky. Mine was the most upvoted, but they chose another. So, someone asked me to post to /v/Pizzagate, which I don't really do, because everything gets deleted. I screenshotted text, so I could fit the character limited, then included links and brief explanations. It is literally the longest, most well sourced post /v/Pizzagate has ever seen. I was immediately told that it violates Rule 3, again.