So because headstones can be placed above nothing, and maybe it's possible to get an entire coroner's office to lie on paperwork, and there's a small chance you can get an entire town to acknowledge it happened it must be a hoax? Let me break this down for you barney style, if you make the claim Sandy Hook was a hoax, that is a positive claim. Therefore you have the burden of proof. And because maybe those Graves could be empty and maybe there is an entire town in on it. Is not proof. If you're going to claim people are lying and are "actors." You have the burden of proof. And" the guy looks sort of like another guy in this one picture" or, "they aren't reacting how I believe someone should act who's child was murdered therefore fake" is not proof.
I know when a child of mine dies, I too will have to get ready and smile for the cameras.
So someone behaves weird while grieving or doesn't act how you believe they should act therefore hoax? You know when my friend was killed 5 feet from me I spent the next two days going from laughing to crying to screaming to smiling to crying etc... so was my whole deployment a hoax since i reacted that way?
And what 'positive' and absolutely verifiable proof do you have that it did happen? Documents only prove the existence of the document itself. Headstones only prove headstones exist. You made a claim that it's all real because of these things yet there are many documents that are falsified for all manner of things and countless headstones with no corpses beneath them. Those are not verifiable, demonstrable proof. You're going to need more to back up your claim that it really happened. That is your burden of proof because no one can prove the nonexistence of a thing but you can certainly prove its existence.
Verified documents, coroner's reports, 911 recordings, the footage of children coming out of the school, the family members of teachers who don't exist anymore where they once did and children who don't exist anymore where they once did, the verification of facts from local level to federal level. All proofs. You can move the goal posts all you want and say, "that's just paper" but I'd be willing to bet if we exumed one body, DNA tested it and verified that was that child related to those parents you would say, "who did the test? Why was there no uniterupted video of the body being exumed and DNA test being run? ... of course they had one ready just incase! Exume them all..." Moving the goal posts is a logical fallacy and if you have to resort to them to keep your position standing, you have already lost and your position isn't worth entertaining.
Any claim presented without evidence can be dismissed without any.
So according to your "proof", the Blair Witch is real too because they put out all kinds of stuff to promote the film as being based on a real life and completely true happening.
I'd be willing to bet if we exumed one body, DNA tested it and verified that was that child related to those parents you would say, "who did the test?
If they actually did that with several independent labs for analysis, then I would put a lot more credence into the story. They will never do this because it would destroy the narrative. In reality it would be a completely controlled setup to stick to the narrative and no one else would be allowed to independently verify the results. It's always that way when it comes to something as questionable as SH. Do you believe Oswald killed JFK all by himself with magic bullets?
I thought you TX guys were supposed to be less gullible and more skeptical about things the government says, particularly about shootings and other gun-grab related things? You're making TX look bad. You must be one of those liberal vegan sissies from Austin who think Beto the fake mexican should be governor.
(post is archived)