but what are the damages?? there are none
but what are the damages?? there are none
Damage to the hoax perpetrators of course! Oy vey!
Damage to the hoax perpetrators of course! Oy vey!
But the hoax was a hoax.
But the hoax was a hoax.
Too bad the 5th Amendment doesn't apply to civil trials, eh? The courts basically told him that he must testify against himself by producing financial records or he will be convicted without any evidence whatsoever.
Too bad the 5th Amendment doesn't apply to civil trials, eh? The courts basically told him that he must testify against himself by producing financial records or he will be convicted without any evidence whatsoever.
just do what the baby powder guys didnt and file for bankruptcy.. never pay a dime
just do what the baby powder guys didnt and file for bankruptcy.. never pay a dime
Who Johnson & Johnson?
And now I cant find talc for my balls....
Who Johnson & Johnson?
And now I cant find talc for my balls....
But he's right this time..
But he's right this time..
he's been right most of the time.
he's been right most of the time.
He was def right about the gay frogs
He was def right about the gay frogs
Pedo Joe trying TAH purge us all for camel toe
Pedo Joe trying TAH purge us all for camel toe
Alex Jones trial was fake also.
Alex Jones trial was fake also.
Well calling grieving parents actors and liars is defamation. Because a guy looks like a guy from another thing therefor hoax? Please pay no mind to the coroner's reports, the funerals, the Graves which any of you can go see for the price of a bus ticket.... yep ...forget all the evidence that demonstrates this isn't a hoax.
Well calling grieving parents actors and liars is defamation. Because a guy looks like a guy from another thing therefor hoax? Please pay no mind to the coroner's reports, the funerals, the Graves which any of you can go see for the price of a bus ticket.... yep ...forget all the evidence that demonstrates this isn't a hoax.
the Graves which any of you can go see for the price of a bus ticket
So do we get to dig them up and do DNA analysis or do you just expect the existence of a headstone with a name should be enough to make it all 100% real? Coroner's reports, funerals and graves can all be falsified to protect the perpetrators of a false flag. You probably believe the NIST reports on the WTC collapses too.
There were once plenty of papers and other scientific writings that linked niggers to monkeys as direct descendants, but you won't take those documents on face value despite them coming from doctors and scientists so why should we believe any of this "evidence" for SH?
>the Graves which any of you can go see for the price of a bus ticket
So do we get to dig them up and do DNA analysis or do you just expect the existence of a headstone with a name should be enough to make it all 100% real? Coroner's reports, funerals and graves can all be falsified to protect the perpetrators of a false flag. You probably believe the NIST reports on the WTC collapses too.
There were once plenty of papers and other scientific writings that linked niggers to monkeys as direct descendants, but you won't take those documents on face value despite them coming from doctors and scientists so why should we believe any of this "evidence" for SH?
So because headstones can be placed above nothing, and maybe it's possible to get an entire coroner's office to lie on paperwork, and there's a small chance you can get an entire town to acknowledge it happened it must be a hoax? Let me break this down for you barney style, if you make the claim Sandy Hook was a hoax, that is a positive claim. Therefore you have the burden of proof. And because maybe those Graves could be empty and maybe there is an entire town in on it. Is not proof. If you're going to claim people are lying and are "actors." You have the burden of proof. And" the guy looks sort of like another guy in this one picture" or, "they aren't reacting how I believe someone should act who's child was murdered therefore fake" is not proof.
So because headstones can be placed above nothing, and maybe it's possible to get an entire coroner's office to lie on paperwork, and there's a small chance you can get an entire town to acknowledge it happened it must be a hoax? Let me break this down for you barney style, if you make the claim Sandy Hook was a hoax, that is a positive claim. Therefore you have the burden of proof. And because maybe those Graves could be empty and maybe there is an entire town in on it. Is not proof. If you're going to claim people are lying and are "actors." You have the burden of proof. And" the guy looks sort of like another guy in this one picture" or, "they aren't reacting how I believe someone should act who's child was murdered therefore fake" is not proof.
I know when a child of mine dies, I too will have to get ready and smile for the cameras.
I know when a child of mine dies, I too will have to get ready and smile for the cameras.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gD_r3D6AU_4
And what 'positive' and absolutely verifiable proof do you have that it did happen? Documents only prove the existence of the document itself. Headstones only prove headstones exist. You made a claim that it's all real because of these things yet there are many documents that are falsified for all manner of things and countless headstones with no corpses beneath them. Those are not verifiable, demonstrable proof. You're going to need more to back up your claim that it really happened. That is your burden of proof because no one can prove the nonexistence of a thing but you can certainly prove its existence.
And what 'positive' and absolutely verifiable proof do you have that it did happen? Documents only prove the existence of the document itself. Headstones only prove headstones exist. You made a claim that it's all real because of these things yet there are many documents that are falsified for all manner of things and countless headstones with no corpses beneath them. Those are not verifiable, demonstrable proof. You're going to need more to back up your claim that it really happened. That is your burden of proof because no one can prove the nonexistence of a thing but you can certainly prove its existence.
Man you know a lot about Hoaxes. Maybe you should write a book. Oh wait somebody did.
Called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. Amazon banned it. Even finding the PDF is tough now.
Im sure you can refute all the evidence....
Man you know a lot about Hoaxes. Maybe you should write a book. Oh wait somebody did.
Called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. Amazon banned it. Even finding the PDF is tough now.
Im sure you can refute all the evidence....
Let me guess... it covers every talking point I just listed? Talks about an active shooter drill at the same time no one can verify? Some of glass landed weird? Heard it all before killer and none of that is evidence, unverifiable claims are not evidence, personal incredulity is not evidence, something looks like a thing therefore hoax, is not evidence.
Let me guess... it covers every talking point I just listed? Talks about an active shooter drill at the same time no one can verify? Some of glass landed weird? Heard it all before killer and none of that is evidence, unverifiable claims are not evidence, personal incredulity is not evidence, something looks like a thing therefore hoax, is not evidence.
(post is archived)