Then so is Hydroxychloroquine.
Then so is Hydroxychloroquine.
thanks, should have included that. Exactly.
thanks, should have included that. Exactly.
I dunno if your theory is correct, maybe, but all this is making my brain hurt.
Not sure if even enough people know of Ivermectin (it is though getting more publicity than hydroxychloroquine) for it to be an effective controlled opposition.
Of course if it is really as effective as they say seems like people would have discovered it by now for the flu and a miserable cold (as I think you mentioned), I don't know.
I dunno if your theory is correct, maybe, but all this is making my brain hurt.
Not sure if even enough people know of Ivermectin (it is though getting more publicity than hydroxychloroquine) for it to be an effective controlled opposition.
Of course if it is really as effective as they say seems like people would have discovered it by now for the flu and a miserable cold (as I think you mentioned), I don't know.
Nitazoxanide is (((their))) next target. If you want to skip the publicity, use it. Its the same deal as ivermectin.
Nitazoxanide is (((their))) next target. If you want to skip the publicity, use it. Its the same deal as ivermectin.
[I've been right about this bullshit every step of the way since the start. Once you look at the facts & admit there never was a virus, and consider that maybe healthy people don't need any medicine at all....ivermectin, hydroxychloroquin, remdisivir, Big Pharma ___. It's 1 - 1 logic. Wtf, how does your brain hurt. The only reason I am posing about this, is because I thought this was obvious 6 months ago, but apparently it's not and I am sick of the controlled opposition not being shot down. What should one take for a Pfizer deficiency? Come on bro](https://files.catbox.moe/m26dxo.jpeg)
(post is archived)