Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

Many of the federal laws are created based on the interstate (between state) commerce clause, including the federal drug laws. However, CO, and all those states that have legalized weed at the state level have challenged the federal drug laws by creating state laws specifically stating that weed should not leave the state (and thus not causing interstate commerce).

So, what happens when state laws specify that people can own all manner of weapons at the state level, but that those weapons must not leave the state?

Many of the federal laws are created based on the interstate (between state) commerce clause, including the federal drug laws. However, CO, and all those states that have legalized weed at the state level have challenged the federal drug laws by creating state laws specifically stating that weed should not leave the state (and thus not causing interstate commerce). So, what happens when state laws specify that people can own all manner of weapons at the state level, but that those weapons must not leave the state?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (25).
[–] • 2 pts

I also knew the guy would go after building your own guns. I have no idea how one would ever enforce this without essentially banning all guns in the process, because there would be no real way of verifying a door to door to see who made one vs bought one.

[–] • 0 pt

That's not the plan. The plan is when a cop finds a "ghost" gun while doing something else (red flag seizure, traffic stop, etc.) you will be charged with that felony, too.