Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

http://archive.is/J340y https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=g0139UytcR8

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

I watched the 2 catbox videos.. I think the only reason they go to great lengths to fake being in space... Is because there is no space.

[–] • 0 pt

I agree. Space is fake and gay. Gravity is fake and gay. Binders with which to further enslave the goy, unaware that they would have to look outside this prison to make any true progress.

[–] • 0 pt

Sure are a lot of old broads/dykes in space.

On one hand, I could see the explanation that the ISS is set up so that there is a visual frame of reference for "up" (the way the banners are hung, the way the laptop is set up etc), and so these astronauts try to orient themselves to it...but then the video ends with what sure looks like gravity affecting a wire kicked by an astronaut.

Though if the ISS is faked, what is that thing that we all can supposedly see every night zooming by?

[–] • 0 pt

I have an app that tells me when iss fkys over me .you can see the panels with good binoculars.. however that doesnt mean anyone is on it

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I'm sure LEO is possible without gravity or standard orbital mechanics being involved. If there is a firmament, it would make sense that there would also be an Aether. However i do not believe that the object we can "see" is capable of the current ISS show we see on TV.

They have a life size replica already in the underwater training facility. Note that whenever they are on film supposedly onboard the ISS in space, their head knows which way is up and will naturally attempt to align itself with gravity to ease the load on the neck. The longer they stay on film the more obvious this becomes.

Apollo 11- Post moon landing Conference

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ULx67SqaB5P7/

https://youtu.be/BI_ZehPOMwI

(One odd moment of many)

Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent {acting} <7v> consta{ntl}y according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.

Thats from newton himself.

http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258