@ReformingBoomer I'm sure LEO is possible without gravity or standard orbital mechanics being involved. If there is a firmament, it would make sense that there would also be an Aether. However i do not believe that the object we can "see" is capable of the current ISS show we see on TV. They have a life size replica already in the underwater training facility. Note that whenever they are on film supposedly onboard the ISS in space, their head knows which way is up and will naturally attempt to align itself with gravity to ease the load on the neck. The longer they stay on film the more obvious this becomes. Apollo 11- Post moon landing Conference https://www.bitchute.com/video/ULx67SqaB5P7/ https://youtu.be/BI_ZehPOMwI (One odd moment of many) * https://youtu.be/xyjppxh2-C0 Apollo11 interview 1989 https://youtu.be/u_Si8Lsyr_0 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4714396/Nasa-DESTROYED-hundreds-mysterious-tapes.html https://www.nasa.gov/feature/not-unsolved-mysteries-the-lost-apollo-11-tapes https://files.catbox.moe/5wxcmi.PNG https://files.catbox.moe/fseu1p.jpg https://www.cnet.com/news/how-nasa-trains-astronauts-40-feet-under-water/ https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/video/nasa-s-neutral-buoyancy-lab-is-like-zero-gravity-on-earth-1003330115607 https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/video/take-a-tour-of-nasa-s-full-size-mockup-of-the-international-space-station-1001749059815 https://www.scubadiving.com/nasas-underwater-lab https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nasa+NBL&t=hp&iax=images&ia=images https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2237819/NASAs-ingenious-moon-simulator-helped-prepare-Apollo-astronauts-land-gone-before.html https://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/multimedia/project-lola.html https://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/Additional_Photos_for_the_Impact_Dynamics_Research_Facility --------------------- Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent {acting} <7v> consta{ntl}y according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers. Thats from newton himself. http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258