Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

938
• (edited )
Nuclear Bombs are a hoax

Edit: For legal reasons I must adjust my headline to read: "The people in these links believe that Nuclear Bombs are a hoax." Please be warned that authors of these articles may have silly ideas and have gone full retard. Thank you for your understanding.

https://theunexpectedcosmology.com/the-atomic-bomb-was-a-hoax-architects-of-hiroshima/

http://heiwaco.com/bombpart1.htm

Miles Mathis pdf: http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf

Edit: For legal reasons I must adjust my headline to read: "The people in these links believe that Nuclear Bombs are a hoax." Please be warned that authors of these articles may have silly ideas and have gone full retard. Thank you for your understanding. https://theunexpectedcosmology.com/the-atomic-bomb-was-a-hoax-architects-of-hiroshima/ http://heiwaco.com/bombpart1.htm Miles Mathis pdf: http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (19).
[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Nuclear Bombs are a hoax

I haven't said anything about "believing" either story.

Pick one.

[–] • 1 pt

None of those articles are written by me. I am providing links for opposing viewpoints. Jesus Christ, can none of you entertain another point of view?

I find it hard to believe that any of the automatic naysayers have even bothered to read any of the links or analyzed any of the original official photographs.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

You made a statement with the title, but I'll bite on your evasion. I read most of the PDF. The evidence boils down to....

How could they get plutonium that fast?

Numerology

Why are these pictures bad?

These people did JFK and faked the moon landings

Your source is retarded, but this wasn't my point at all. So have fun being retarded.

[–] • 1 pt

It's not an evasion. Do you only post things that you absolutely agree with? I didn't know that was a rule of the site.

Conspiracy threads are for the purpose of examining alternative ideas. I find it interesting to re-examine the things that I have always believed to be true. In fact any subject I've ever bothered to read about has people claiming opposite truths. So should I just believe the first one I read, or believe the one that the majority consensus tells me I must?

So yes, flat earth, moon landings, political assassinations, realities of wars, all these things are disputed by someone.