WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

691

Edit: For legal reasons I must adjust my headline to read: "The people in these links believe that Nuclear Bombs are a hoax." Please be warned that authors of these articles may have silly ideas and have gone full retard. Thank you for your understanding.

https://theunexpectedcosmology.com/the-atomic-bomb-was-a-hoax-architects-of-hiroshima/

http://heiwaco.com/bombpart1.htm

Miles Mathis pdf: http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf

Edit: For legal reasons I must adjust my headline to read: "The people in these links believe that Nuclear Bombs are a hoax." Please be warned that authors of these articles may have silly ideas and have gone full retard. Thank you for your understanding. https://theunexpectedcosmology.com/the-atomic-bomb-was-a-hoax-architects-of-hiroshima/ http://heiwaco.com/bombpart1.htm Miles Mathis pdf: http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf

(post is archived)

You made a statement with the title, but I'll bite on your evasion. I read most of the PDF. The evidence boils down to....

How could they get plutonium that fast?

Numerology

Why are these pictures bad?

These people did JFK and faked the moon landings

Your source is retarded, but this wasn't my point at all. So have fun being retarded.

[–] 1 pt

It's not an evasion. Do you only post things that you absolutely agree with? I didn't know that was a rule of the site.

Conspiracy threads are for the purpose of examining alternative ideas. I find it interesting to re-examine the things that I have always believed to be true. In fact any subject I've ever bothered to read about has people claiming opposite truths. So should I just believe the first one I read, or believe the one that the majority consensus tells me I must?

So yes, flat earth, moon landings, political assassinations, realities of wars, all these things are disputed by someone.

Jesus. Always the same with you people. Having a double threaded discussion because you can't stay on point.

  1. I don't post absolute titles on subjects I am on the fence about. Call me an 'automatic naysayer' if it makes you feel better, but your hypocrisy knows no bounds.

  2. You keep doing you, and I'll keep doing me. I think your sources are bad and use terribly flawed arguments anyone with a head full of brain cells could see are mere fallacy laden drivel. I'll keep using my brain.

Like I said.. have fun being retarded (aka think what you want, I'm don't really feel like wasting my time arguing with the mentally handicapped), but I'm betting you'll reply back attempting to continue this argument, all while claiming I am attacking you and/or your beliefs.

[–] 0 pt

>I'm betting you'll reply back attempting to continue this argument, all while claiming I am attacking you and/or your beliefs

Nope, you're wrong, I fully accept that I'm a retard. Thanks for taking the time to point that out to me.