WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

868

Is because, when they short the power grid -- and blame it on terrorism, solar flares, whatever -- they will achieve maximum damage and control.

Mark my words, the grid will go down in our lifetime. For how long is anyone's guess.

Is because, when they short the power grid -- and blame it on terrorism, solar flares, whatever -- they will achieve maximum damage and control. Mark my words, the grid will go down in our lifetime. For how long is anyone's guess.

(post is archived)

Yeah I hear ya. But first, I hate carbs. Very inefficient. Also new cars a certainly more safe, have more horsepower and very nice features. But, I understand what you're saying, yes if it breaks down, I'll need a tow truck.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

With inefficiency comes serviceability, but the "inefficiency" of carbed motors is a bit of a myth. There were cars per 1975, carbed, that ran 30 or more MPG. I'll try to remember a few if I can. I never cared to memorise or write down the names, not expected them to be impossible to find with a google search. As time, machining, metallurgy and understanding of tolerances has progressed, I don't think it would be a stretch to think that carbureted motors could reach today's mpg had they stayed in service.

[–] 0 pt

Old japanese hatchbacks did over 50MPG with carbs.

This^

Linux is hard but you can make it do anything you want.

E-cars are easy, but they wont let you do a damn thing without a proprietary device or other such nonsense.

Mechanical devices work for everyone.

We must learn to 'see the cage'

[–] 0 pt

10MPG is worth not being suicided by ZOG.