Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

544

If they want Trump to testify they can subpoena him. At this point this is just a big conspiracy to smear him and they are hoping that most people don't know how our court systems work. A "strong adverse inference" ? Try "a blatant violation of the 5th Amendment"

If they want Trump to testify they can subpoena him. At this point this is just a big conspiracy to smear him and they are hoping that most people don't know how our court systems work. A "strong adverse inference" ? Try "a blatant violation of the 5th Amendment"

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (3).
[–] • 1 pt

Agreed... but they can force him to show up and sit in the chair and he then can refuse to say anything... My point is that this "strong adverse inference" stuff is complete BS. Trying to implicate that refusing to testify against yourself is a indication of guilt is the definition of a violation of the 5th... so much so that they had invent new terms for it because they legally can't say what they want

[–] • 0 pt

Good point.

The adverse inference (for them) is that anyone with half a brain would infer that this whole thing is bullshit.