Read the highlighted portions. I would argue that if anyone belives there are parallels between what it says and Qanon, you probably have already bought several bridges. Q never argued that anyone has changed. Opps, just like that destroyed the narative of the article. Q simply educated people on how the world actually works and who's doing what within our government. He did so using the Socratic Method; all by simply asking questions. People did the research and reached their own conclusions. That's the exact opposite of what the article claims is a parallel. Opps, again destroyed the article's narative. Why is the Socratic Method so popular? Why is it so popular in education and learning?