Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

296

Currently the entire human view is Globalist.

We live in a globe=globalist

I know it’s hard to accept at first. I was there. However, I’ve worked on ships for a majority of my life and believed the “curve of the ocean” it’s Bullshit. I got a new pair of binoculars and the ships reappeared.

What other proofs do Globalists have that they live on a spinning ball?

It sure as hell isn’t gravity. You can’t have gravity hold oceans to the earth while it’s spinning 1k an hour. It’s monumentally stupid to believe, it would spin off like

What other proofs do you have that you live on a globalist earth? The moon landing??? That shit is fake and everyone knows it.

Take 69 seconds to think why you believe what you believe and you will realize you have been lied to.

Same thing goes for the Qoomer movement. You were lied to. It didn’t happen. The whole earth is a stage and one thing I know is that it is NOT spinning.

Wake up. You DO matter and you are NOT an insignificant speck spinning in an empty universe. You matter. You were created doe a reason and the reason is an enclosed Flat Earth

Currently the entire human view is Globalist. We live in a globe=globalist I know it’s hard to accept at first. I was there. However, I’ve worked on ships for a majority of my life and believed the “curve of the ocean” it’s Bullshit. I got a new pair of binoculars and the ships reappeared. What other proofs do Globalists have that they live on a spinning ball? It sure as hell isn’t gravity. You can’t have gravity hold oceans to the earth while it’s spinning 1k an hour. It’s monumentally stupid to believe, it would spin off like [this](https://p0.pikist.com/photos/487/189/tennis-tennis-ball-spinning-ball-turning-round-splash-wet-water-drops-thumbnail.jpg) What other proofs do you have that you live on a globalist earth? The moon landing??? That shit is fake and everyone knows it. Take 69 seconds to think why you believe what you believe and you will realize you have been lied to. Same thing goes for the Qoomer movement. You were lied to. It didn’t happen. The whole earth is a stage and one thing I know is that it is NOT spinning. Wake up. You DO matter and you are NOT an insignificant speck spinning in an empty universe. You matter. You were created doe a reason and the reason is an enclosed Flat Earth

(post is archived)

[–] • 7 pts

It’s flat. And more people are waking up to this truth about our reality. The brainwashing is deep, but can still be cracked.

If truth is important to you... sadly it’s NOT important to a lot of people.

[–] • 2 pts

One thing I always say, ALL flat earthers were globalists at one point. The only difference is we asked questions. That’s it. Only difference

[–] • 2 pts

I definitely was... the only reason I know the truth now is because I tried to debunk it!!

Was very hard for me to breakthrough the globe conditioning, but truth prevails. Always.

[–] • 3 pts

maybe the earth is a sphere, just as a particle. but the world maps are still fake, and the earth size and the real curvature is nothing like the globalists say it is.

the moon landings are fake, but that doesnt mean that theres no man on the moon. its fake like the maps, and the distance to the moon is a lie.

if the earth was a ball then it wouldnt spin sideways, it would roll forward like every ball does. i dont believe the earth is spinning, we see just a reflection that changes for whatever reasons, and it looks like as if it was spinning but it isnt.

[–] • 1 pt

It’s flat. Test for yourself.

[–] • 3 pts

"I got a new pair of binoculars and the ships reappeared."

Not going to acknowledge or discredit any of your claims, however would like to comment how fucking trippy that would have been to see.

[–] • 4 pts

It's trippy when you realize it's not supposed to happen.

That's the weird part. I've seen ships dissapear all the time over the horizon. And I can plot them on the radar, however, once I entertained the idea of a flat earth and saw the ships again with better binoculars it really made me question everything. It's not supposed to happen. And these experiments aren't 20 feet in the crows nest. It's right there on water.

Like I said before I used to be a genius becuase I believed in a Globalist earth, but as soon as I began to ask questions, somehow magically I became a moron. That's not how it works.

[–] • 1 pt

I literally had an acquaintance tell me that they considered me to be quite intelligent, so how can I ‘believe’ the earth is flat?! I said the truth, I don’t believe it, I’ve had to accept that it is flat due to the tests and experiments I’ve conducted.

[–] • 3 pts

There’s heaps of videos with Nikon P900’s showing it. It’s gotta make you think. Likewise, the videos from pilot cockpits showing an absolutely flat horizon at eye level.

Also consider that planes do not angle down to follow the ‘curve’ of the earth. They fly level.

https://pic8.co/sh/gO200J.jpeg

[–] • 2 pts

I’ve talked to two people who work on submarines. One was a navigator. Neither said they adjust for the curvature. Once they set a depth they stay at that depth.

[–] • 1 pt

Pilots ‘suppose’ they are flying over a flat, stationary plane.

These are not glitches, it’s because the earth IS flat!

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Sorry but we are simulations running on a computer in the Alpha Centauri star system.

[–] • 1 pt

Why would you apologize for what you believe in?

[–] • 1 pt

If this computer simulation theory is true i think we are having some serious glitches in this timeline.

[–] • 1 pt

Simulations on a flat plane of existence.

[–] • 1 pt

Based. I could get behind this as well. I hope I awaken to some slammin-hot pleadian babes in pastel clothes on some spaceship as a hero from my work here.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

If the Erf is flat then why are muh balls round huh?

[–] • 2 pts

Serious question here. The north star can be seen in some places "the northern hemisphere" and the southern cross can be seen in other places "southern hemisphere". How does this phenomenon happen in the flat earth model? If there is a 3d model video that explains this that would be great (im a visual kind of person).

[–] • 3 pts

You can see the North Star from South Africa. It should be impossible on a Globalist Earth. I had a friend take a picture of the damn thing. The earth is not what you are told. Simple observation proves it. [Here's a video on perspective](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5M7vdrBrZc_

[–] • 0 pt

How come I can see holes at the poles of Saturn and that it is an obvious sphere but the earth is flat? Bullshit. All planets are hollow.

[–] • 3 pts

You are looking through a 2d telescope. You don't know what you are looking at is a sphere. Speaking of spheres. How can you play basketball when the court is flat?

[–] • 1 pt

... With a basketball that is HOLLOW. That's how.

[–] • 1 pt

Billiard balls are spheres, billiard tables are flat.

Just test it for yourself. Or keep sucking down that kikeball jizz, cause that what it is.

[–] • 0 pt

No idea mr fuk? Do you know whats up with the north star / southern cross deal within the flat earth model?

[–] • 1 pt

Works fine from Hollow earth. I think what you posit is actually a supporter of Hollow earth... by the way... I just spout this shit at the flatties to piss them off because Hollow is simply easier to argue. Lava earth is the easiest to argue though ha ha but wheres the fun in that.

[–] • 0 pt

https://youtu.be/GkDKZruZ8Ek

There’s lots of theories about the southern stars. This is what I believe to be the most likely.

The earth is flat. Test for yourself. I have, which is why the theories are interesting, but they don’t negate the fact that there is no curvature, so we simply do not live on a sphere.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Hey, I watched a great video about this about a year ago, but surprise, surprise it’s no longer in my watch history. I found this one which is a lot briefer but still posits the same theory - definitely only a theory.

Unlike the flatness of the earth, which I urge you to test for yourself. Given the ‘accepted’ size of the globe in the heliocentric theory, there is observably, repeatedly and (most importantly) measurably NO curvature. That was the clincher for me personally, when I tested for curvature myself with a far away landmark. IF the earth were a ball (using the ’accepted’ dimensions), the landmark should be completely hidden by the curve. I should never be able to see it. But I see it, unless it’s raining. But don’t take my word for it, or anyone’s, just complete your own tests using the scientific method. You can use the altimeter on your phone, distance.to and search up any ‘earth curve calculator’ (I used a few different ones) or even do the math yourself, if you are so inclined. Then when you find out it IS flat, you have the torturous task of breaking through your conditioning. Not fun.

https://youtu.be/GkDKZruZ8Ek

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

what math did you use? i look up the earths radius and circumference, i divide the circumference by 360°. now i know how long a section of 1° is. then i divide 1° by that length. now i know 1km distance = x°. now i take the cos of x°. now i multiply the radius by the cos°. and finally i subtract that resulting number from the real radius.

[–] • 1 pt

a = √[(r + h)² - r²]

where:

a stands for the distance to the horizon, h is your eyesight level, and r is the Earth's radius, equal to 3959 miles or 6371 km.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah ive look at different things but the north pole / southern cross thing is what really doesnt seem to fit in the fe model. Can Australians see the north star?

[–] • 0 pt

So you didn’t understand the video?

[–] • 0 pt

The flats deny the existence of photographs, take from space and the moon, that clearly show that the Earth is a spinning globe. Why wouldn't they just deny the existence of the Southern Cross?

[–] • 0 pt

I dont know. Ive never heard a fe explanation of the southern cross not being seen from canada er wherever.

[–] • 1 pt

Earth is HOLLOW....... Holes in the poles.... Star in the middle.... everyone knows this.

[–] • 3 pts

You’re making a joke. The point though is fair. Even physicists admit there is just as much proof for a flat earth as there is for a globalist earth.

It’s comical that these space niggers are exploring Mars when 90% of the oceans on earth are unexplored.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

>It’s comical that these space niggers are exploring Mars when 90% of the oceans on earth are unexplored.

Yes! We need an ocean 'voyager I'

[–] • 1 pt

No... Its real. HOLLOW EARTH. The Nazis know. The government knows. There are maps under the ice to the holes. There are endless accounts and fables and stories and etc. proving it. Its hollow. No doubt about it. Get me a Russian nuclear icebreaker and we can go there and see the interior of the planet.

[–] • 2 pts

i've read the evidence and theres more for hollow earth than there is for 'muh moon landing' this I can tell you

[–] • 0 pt

There may be a lower level, or we may be a flat disk within a spherical firmament, but we are definitely on a flat plane of existence.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Chad theory

[–] • 0 pt

Chad knows it flat because his cock deflates after he bangs a virgin. #proof

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

For the world is hollow and I have touched the sky.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Well.... They literally lied about the Holocaust, germ theory, 9/11, USS Liberty, Waco, Boston Bombing, Vegas Shooting, Sandy Hook and so on....

Why the fuck not??

[–] • 0 pt

Fucking Christ Poal has this shit here too? Why couldn't have this died with VOAT. This shit here, ffs

[–] • 4 pts

Now. Stop. Think for 69 seconds and give me your absolute proof for a globalist earth? Genuine question

[–] • -1 pt

That's not how accusation works. You are the accuser, the burden of proof is upon you, not me.

[–] • 5 pts

It’s flat bro. We didn’t come to this retarded sounding conclusion over night because we watched a YouTube video last week. 99% of the search results you’ll currently find on the subject are simply there too mock it and make it look clownish. The truth is it’s been YEARS since all the good flat earth info was available. The good juicy stuff was wiped and internet memory holed long before pizzagate was even a phrase. The early online suppression and censorship of all the good flat earth discussion stuff is what actually reinforced the belief so hard in many of us. Why the fuck couldn’t we even talk about it seriously anymore? Why shut it down so hard if there is nothing to it?

[–] • 3 pts

No the burden of proof is on you. YOU are the one that beiieves in a Globalist earth. What's the proof? It's main stream science. You should be able to regurgitate something like an NPC. Lets hear it.

[–] • 0 pt

The earth IS flat. You are simply too cowardly or lazy to challenge your own belief.

[–] • 0 pt

Planet is hollow... Holes in the Poals. Why do you think they made POAL the name of this site. This site supports hollow earth.

[–] • 0 pt

We could give all you hollow earth types, and all the flat earth types, knives, and lock you all together in a big, dark room. Then you could decide the issue.

[–] • 0 pt

The ancient Greeks, many centuries before Christ, with only the most primitive instruments, were able to figure out and demonstrate that the Earth is a globe. Are you white? Because, if you are, you defile your own heritage by writing the nonsense you write.

[–] • 1 pt

Did you know these Greeks? No. But trust the kike book that told you what these strangers ‘proved’. Then when you grow up, you can test for curvature yourself and discover that it was A BIG FAT LIE. It’s flat.

[–] • 0 pt

No, that experiment was a hoax. You’re referencing the well experiment. No it’s well (heh) known that is not proof for a globe earth and for the experiment to be accurate you need three locations not two.

Again, that experiment ALSO proves flat earth the only difference is you have to assume the sun is much smaller and closer to earth. When I say that scientists genuinely have as much proof for a flat earth as a globe earth I’m not lying. There’s a reason why this was/is such a hotly debated topic because they math fits both models perfectly it just depends on perspective.