Ok. I understand where you're coming from. Ty. Firstly, IoT does not mean 5G. In fact it doesn't even mean wireless. And where it does mean wireless, it doesn't have to mean 5G. For example, most IoT devices today use ethernet or 2.4Ghz radios and likely wifi. Above, where I mentioned concurrency, is really the value of 5G and IoT. Because it allows for more devices to have cel RF service. That said, many devices are still using 3G and 4G (though 3G is basically dying out). Additionally, many devices use frequencies in the 900Mhz range (and many other frequencies). Albeit with slower bit rates. But reporting things like temp and luminosity doesn't require much bandwidth. My point being, the only thing new about IoT is the marketing buzz surrounding it. These days everything from electric meters to remote gas valves and even power lines are IoTs. And have been for a decade or two. Much is hyped about 5G and IoT. But the fact is, that's marketing hope and not current reality. For example, each Toyota vehicle reports millions of samples per day. It does this over 4G. In this regard, 5G doesn't really change anything. You also said you believe 5G carries health risks. The primary difference between 5G and wifi is signaling and bit rates. Signaling is the difference between "hi" and "hello". Bit rate is the speed at which those are communicated. Which of the two phrases is more harmful to you; "hi", or, "hello"?