As real as the holocaust.
As real as the holocaust.
This needs a short english pdf version with the relevant court documents attached to it. And then versions in german, french, spanish, italian. Because this anne frank crap is boomer reference material, you destroy the anne frank myth they have a valid reason to doubt the entire ww2 official narrative. A valid reason that they just can't overlook. Anne frank's diary is fake, why? Why is it still paraded to this day as authentic in schools? What else is a total fabrication?
This needs a short english pdf version with the relevant court documents attached to it. And then versions in german, french, spanish, italian. Because this anne frank crap is boomer reference material, you destroy the anne frank myth they have a valid reason to doubt the entire ww2 official narrative. A valid reason that they just can't overlook. Anne frank's diary is fake, why? Why is it still paraded to this day as authentic in schools? What else is a total fabrication?
Wanna team up and crank it out?
I can do first pass if you willing to help on an edit. That’ll help me stick to it.. we can pull others in for translations. Maybe I consider starting a sub for redpill translations.
Wanna team up and crank it out?
I can do first pass if you willing to help on an edit. That’ll help me stick to it.. we can pull others in for translations. Maybe I consider starting a sub for redpill translations.
Why not
First we need the original docs
>In 1980, as a result of a lawsuit in a german court, the German State Forensic Bureau (BKA) forensically examined the original diary manuscript. The analysis determined that significant portions of the manuscript was written with a fine ballpoint pen.
>The BKA also determined that none of the manuscript matched the handwriting of Anne Frank.
>The real author of the Diary was Meyer Levin.
I'm going to look around see if I find those (documents), that's probably going to be in german so unless an english speaker wrote an article on it with links to the original documents, that's going to be hard since I don't speak german
Edit: https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/authenticity-diary-anne-frank/
I'm reading the "official" rebuttal, this might be harder to crack than previously anticipated. No idea how much truth or BS this rebuttal carries, since there are no links to prove the claims
I can claim the earth is flat
Why not
First we need the original docs
>>In 1980, as a result of a lawsuit in a german court, the German State Forensic Bureau (BKA) forensically examined the original diary manuscript. The analysis determined that significant portions of the manuscript was written with a fine ballpoint pen.
>>The BKA also determined that none of the manuscript matched the handwriting of Anne Frank.
>>The real author of the Diary was Meyer Levin.
I'm going to look around see if I find those (documents), that's probably going to be in german so unless an english speaker wrote an article on it with links to the original documents, that's going to be hard since I don't speak german
Edit: https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/authenticity-diary-anne-frank/
I'm reading the "official" rebuttal, this might be harder to crack than previously anticipated. No idea how much truth or BS this rebuttal carries, since there are no links to prove the claims
I can claim the earth is flat
Thank you for the momentum. Getting the original docs is what I am going to focus in on. After about 30 minutes this morning, no luck.
I did some prelim with the same source to see some of the defense and the disputes to BKA. Looks like there were multiple reviews forensic studies and BKA was the only one with not perfect Jewish results.
>In 1987, a Mr Ockelmann from Hamburg wrote that his mother had written the annotation sheets in question. Mrs Ockelmann was a member of the team that carried out the graphological investigation into the writings of Anne Frank around 1960
One thing to note is how much this authenticity page extrapolates the argument to holocaust denial and ultimately how much they focus on the character of those who doubt authenticity. Seems like a greater agenda than factually validating the diary. ALso weird how they bring in Freedom of Speech and legality to that page. Fucking parasites. Lots of claims validating it, no real "evidence" though. A fishy page I would think for most independent thinkers.
I can't find a primary source for the life of me. My best attempt this morning is finding images of it:
- https://www.sciencealert.com/dirty-jokes-on-hidden-pages-in-anne-frank-diaries-revealed
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Diary_of_Anne_Frank_28_sep_1942.jpg
- https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.xLKkcLqWOpJAAeMG4JahCwHaEK?pid=Api&rs=1
Logically, I think this should follow the lines of:
- Identify primary source - if we cant find primary source, that's telling (spoiler, I dont think we will be able to)
- Once primary source obtained, analyze writing and translate
- In parallel, validate the settlement of Meyer Levin, if he got paid, we have more thread to pull on
- Compile findings in a one page PDF ("meme format") and work with some anons to translate
I will keep digging. There should be some scanned version of the whole diary if this is all authentic history.
Thank you for the momentum. Getting the original docs is what I am going to focus in on. After about 30 minutes this morning, no luck.
I did some prelim with the same source to see some of the defense and the disputes to BKA. Looks like there were multiple reviews forensic studies and BKA was the only one with not perfect Jewish results.
>>In 1987, a Mr Ockelmann from Hamburg wrote that his mother had written the annotation sheets in question. Mrs Ockelmann was a member of the team that carried out the graphological investigation into the writings of Anne Frank around 1960
[Not a source I trust but sadly one many will](https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/authenticity-diary-anne-frank/)
One thing to note is how much this authenticity page extrapolates the argument to holocaust denial and ultimately how much they focus on the character of those who doubt authenticity. Seems like a greater agenda than factually validating the diary. ALso weird how they bring in Freedom of Speech and legality to that page. Fucking parasites. Lots of claims validating it, no real "evidence" though. A fishy page I would think for most independent thinkers.
I can't find a primary source for the life of me. My best attempt this morning is finding images of it:
- https://www.sciencealert.com/dirty-jokes-on-hidden-pages-in-anne-frank-diaries-revealed
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Diary_of_Anne_Frank_28_sep_1942.jpg
- https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.xLKkcLqWOpJAAeMG4JahCwHaEK?pid=Api&rs=1
Logically, I think this should follow the lines of:
1. Identify primary source - if we cant find primary source, that's telling (spoiler, I dont think we will be able to)
2. Once primary source obtained, analyze writing and translate
3. In parallel, validate the settlement of Meyer Levin, if he got paid, we have more thread to pull on
4. Compile findings in a one page PDF ("meme format") and work with some anons to translate
I will keep digging. There should be some scanned version of the whole diary if this is all authentic history.
The Jews lie about everything, but they get away with it because muh anti-Semitism. Showing a normie incontestible proof of Jewish fraud, such as the fake diary, or those side-by-side pics of the Auschwitz "chimney" - built in the 1950s by Soviet jews - will only get you hated and shunned by the goyim who have been fooled.
The Jews lie about everything, but they get away with it because muh anti-Semitism. Showing a normie incontestible proof of Jewish fraud, such as the fake diary, or those side-by-side pics of the Auschwitz "chimney" - built in the 1950s by Soviet jews - will only get you hated and shunned by the goyim who have been fooled.
I remember reading the Jew explanation of this years ago. It was something along the lines that Anne Frank's father "revised and edited" her diary after her death to make it more readable. This other guy, Meyer Levin, was hired for some project to do with the dairy -- a movie, I think it was, or something like that. He did some writing, and Anne Frank's dad, being a good Jew, tried to stiff him. But the Jew writer Levin hired some Jew lawyers and got his money anyway.
I remember reading the Jew explanation of this years ago. It was something along the lines that Anne Frank's father "revised and edited" her diary after her death to make it more readable. This other guy, Meyer Levin, was hired for some project to do with the dairy -- a movie, I think it was, or something like that. He did some writing, and Anne Frank's dad, being a good Jew, tried to stiff him. But the Jew writer Levin hired some Jew lawyers and got his money anyway.
(post is archived)