Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

751

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Historical temperature data makes our global warming bullshit look stupid so it turns out the data is wrong.

[–] • 2 pts

The user name holds up. You sir, have optimized this blathering shit rag article into a single, clear, concise sentence.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

When the observations don't match the models, now they just change the observations.

This shit has been going on for years already though, with land based measurements that are "homogenized" and adjusted. Typically, they adjust the past to be cooler, and the present to be a little warmer. When you remove these adjustments, there is pretty much no "global warming" at all.

One would suspect that the satelite dataset that they are targeting here is the UAH lower troposphere dataset. This observational dataset is routinely measuring at or below the low end of climate "model" projections. Some other satelite datasets have already "adjusted" their data to better agree with the models. Now, they will say that because UAH unadjusted data doesn't agree with the adjusted data and the "models", then it must be wrong. Fucking Orwellian.

[–] • 1 pt

Buuuuuulllllllshhhhiiiiiitttttt! The liberal cunts don't like the satellite data because it contradicts their narraitve, so they are always looking for some plausible way to invalidate it.

[–] • 0 pt

Lmao. Gold jerry. Gold!