WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

421

The semiconductor giant discloses hundreds of more layoffs in California as it continues a multibillion-dollar cost-cutting effort started more than a year to weather what CEO Pat Gelsinger has called a ‘pronounced slowdown in demand.’

That doesn't bode well for the Ohio plant, that was only supposed to start if demand required it.

> The semiconductor giant discloses hundreds of more layoffs in California as it continues a multibillion-dollar cost-cutting effort started more than a year to weather what CEO Pat Gelsinger has called a ‘pronounced slowdown in demand.’ That doesn't bode well for the Ohio plant, that was only supposed to start if demand required it.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

That's an if.

Right now, Intel has publicly stated they will only manufacture here if demand requires it - and demand does not require it right now.

[–] 1 pt

That's hard to believe when they're spending millions on building an entire plant that will end up being cheaper to run and more modern than existing ones.

[–] 1 pt

They're not spending any money on a plant. It's being built by a capital firm who will lease it back to Intel.