WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Let's put the government in control of commerce so this never happens again

Socialism? Just the tip, baby. I promise I won't ram it in you

[–] 0 pt

Amazon wants control over what sellers sell on their venue, and they want a cut of sales. That kind of, in part, makes them responsible for the sales.

Contrast that to a flea market where there's just a venue where sellers sell, no restrictions (beyond illegal stuff) and no cut of merchandise sold save the table setup fee.

Very different scenarios

If you buy a car stereo at the flea market and it doesn't meet your expectations you cannot return to the flea market next week and get your money back

Amazon puts their neck out for their sellers and can set whatever standards they deem necessary to satisfy customers

They do the hard part. Fulfillment and shipping. They charge the retailer a modest, very modest fee and handle returns

[–] 0 pt

Yes, that's why I said contrast to. Amazon is maintaining part of the supply chain for their customers (the sellers,) so Amazon is partially responsible for the merchandise that they warehouse, ship, and manage.